His comments are obvious.
The reasoning is the exact opposite of what you say. The missile attack would be swift and immediate.
It would plan for capitulation prior to any international response being possible.
John H K has a history, so my comment does not come from left field. To discuss and dismiss any threat to Taiwan by simply talking about the difficulty of a Normandy style invasion (in long and unnecessary pseudo-detail as he did as well) while ignroing the actual major issues of missiles and submarine blockade is to make no real sense.
It is in fact a way to obfuscate the issue rather than shed light on it.
And, PS, I seem to remember you as well. So your silly posts is not surprising.
And you call me silly?