Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ValerieUSA
I recall my late wife telling me that, at least in Illinois, third-party life insurance requires the consent of the 'insured'. I don't think there must be an insurable interest necessarily, but I don't think secret policies are kosher.

[FYI, I may be misremembering or misunderstanding what my wife told me, but since worked in the industry and passed her LOMA courses, she should have known].

24 posted on 04/16/2002 6:54:22 AM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
I didn't go past LOMA 1, however I think you are correct.
31 posted on 04/16/2002 7:50:33 AM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
I recall my late wife telling me that, at least in Illinois, third-party life insurance requires the consent of the 'insured'. I don't think there must be an insurable interest necessarily, but I don't think secret policies are kosher.

I think it says somewhere in the article that the employees were told about and signed onto a $5000 "free" death benefit without realizing that Walmart would get the rest of the $64k.

47 posted on 04/17/2002 8:08:21 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson