Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Media Asks For Access To Westerfield Documents And Trial

Motion Requests Cameras In Court And End To Gag Order

 

POSTED: 4:08 p.m. PDT April 15, 2002
UPDATED: 4:17 p.m. PDT April 15, 2002

 

A lawyer for local television stations and newspapers filed a motion Monday urging a judge to remove tight restrictions on media coverage of the David Westerfield murder trial.David Westerfield

Attorney Guylyn Cummins filed a request with Judge William Mudd for an urgent hearing on the matter. Mudd ruled last week that future motions in the Westerfield case will be sealed until hearings scheduled for May 6. The judge also ruled there would be no live TV coverage of the pretrial hearings in the case. Trial is set to begin May 17. Another judge placed a gag order on investigators, attorneys and other participants in the trial. Cummins' motion asks Mudd to unseal the pretrial motions, lift the gag restrictions and allow cameras access to the pretrial hearing. The motion argues that the trial is of tremendous public importance because Westerfield is charged with kidnapping and killing Danielle van Dam and could face a possible death sentence if convicted. Allegations of police misconduct have also surfaced in the case.

The motion argues that public access to trial proceedings is constitutionally protected and the judge has not presented any overriding reasons for sealing the pretrial motions or gagging trial participants. It also argues that there is no compelling reason to deny camera or electronic access to pretrial hearings.

A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Thursday morning at 8:30 a.m.

1 posted on 04/15/2002 6:14:34 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious;spectre;Amore;Travis McGee;BunnySlippers;Doughtyone;Hillary's Lovely Legs;Snow Bunny...
Ping...) ) )
2 posted on 04/15/2002 6:16:40 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
so why do you think he wants the records?
3 posted on 04/15/2002 6:32:13 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA; Howlin
Interestingly enough, people and news organizations who have tried to acquire the official court transcripts have been refused. Although the court reporter is a public servant in this case, she nonetheless claims there are copyright protections--something I've never heard of before, but then I'm not a court reporter. It's customary to charge a fee for them, but apparently they're not for sale at any price. I always thought these things were supposed to be public records?
8 posted on 04/15/2002 7:44:55 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
Ping for Thursday at 8:30 am.

Justice for Danielle. Justice for all.

sw

20 posted on 04/16/2002 5:47:52 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FresnoDA
bump
26 posted on 04/16/2002 11:02:07 AM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson