Skip to comments.
Don't smoke! It's like stealing from your company!
Las Vegas Review-Journal ^
| April 14, 2002
| Steve Sebelius
Posted on 04/15/2002 6:04:02 PM PDT by Max McGarrity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: puff_list
Nevada, with its wink-and-a-nod toward enjoyable human frailties has been Kookiefornia's "smoking section" since Robber Reiner reared his ugly head here. Now Nevada is in the anti-smoker crosshairs.
To: Max McGarrity
Even though I don't smoke, I feel that it is the morbidly obese that drive up health care costs more.
3
posted on
04/15/2002 6:06:53 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: glorgau
It's the morbidly obese smokers that are driving up the costs. Tax my ex-wife. Please.
/john
To: Max McGarrity
I suppose a guy is a thief if he retires at 50, too.
To: kd5cts
LOL. That was quick.
Smoking may cost corporations in lost productivity but it saves money for the Federal Government. Smokers tend to die early, hence, less strain on the SS System.
6
posted on
04/15/2002 6:14:55 PM PDT
by
leadpenny
To: kd5cts
It's the morbidly obese smokers that are driving up the costs. Tax my ex-wife. Please. /john LOL, oh my Gawd, there is nothing worse than a morbidly obese smoker!
These are the last of the unacceptable vices left to humankind!
7
posted on
04/15/2002 6:17:42 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
To: Max McGarrity
But think of all the money we save on Social Security benefits not paid to people who croak before they can collect. What will they say when the unitended consequence of their campaign is the destruction of SS? Go ahead, smoke and die early because we can't support you in your old age?
8
posted on
04/15/2002 6:18:26 PM PDT
by
PsyOp
To: glorgau
Bingo
9
posted on
04/15/2002 6:21:15 PM PDT
by
Unicorn
To: leadpenny
Smoking may cost corporations in lost productivity Only if they "belong" to the corporations. Actually, a recent study by Rand proved that neither smoking nor obesity was as costly in lost productivity as poverty. So why are they trying to create MORE poverty by taxing smokers out of all their money?
To: Max McGarrity
Now will the nags who take such great joy in telling the rest of us how to run our lives please shut up?
Who wants to bet that at least a few of said nags will able in here (if they've not done so already) demanding where this man gets off trying to remove their right to nag? ;)
To: Max McGarrity
Stupid people cause more loss productivity than anything else.
12
posted on
04/15/2002 6:30:23 PM PDT
by
TexRef
To: glorgau
Yep, and considering that everyone I know who has quite smoking gains about 40-50 pounds over the first couple of years, I guess that means we should all smoke. Come to think of it, hasn't it just been since all the smoking nazis have been hitting the airways that suddenly America's biggest problem is obesity? Wonder if the two are connected.
To: Max McGarrity
Oh my stars! I just lit one and am on a guilt trip!
What a crock of clinton: The fuzzy CDC science data re smokers dying early does not account for many other factors such as sedentary life style, burgers and fries, etc. Smokers do fit such a pattern
I get a barf alert every time I read the latest spewing from the Smoking Gestapo.
14
posted on
04/15/2002 6:35:21 PM PDT
by
oldtimer
To: Max McGarrity
people die too early and thus truncate their productive years. What BS. Big companies like Ford Motor for example, make it a point to encourage (buy out/coerce/withold promotions/layoff/fire, etc.) employees in their mid thirties to forties (the most productive years) to leave because they don't want to pay the pension and health insurance of potentialy healthy retires.
Been there, done that.
Sui
15
posted on
04/15/2002 6:39:37 PM PDT
by
suijuris
To: Max McGarrity
Yawn.
Anybody take the CDC seriously?
Since I found out that all deaths of smokers, whether 24 or 104, is automatically tabulated as smoking-related I wouldn't trust those clowns if they told me gravity is working.
Job security and control. Perfect totalitarian formula.
To: Max McGarrity
The CDC should run ads encouraging people to smoke so they'll die before drawing huge amounts of money out of Medicare and Social Security. Teenage smoking would drop to nothing immediately.
17
posted on
04/15/2002 6:40:58 PM PDT
by
supercat
To: All
And here I thought the gist of the Tobacco lawsuites was that smokers drive up the cost of health care. If they don't live as long, they shouldn't be consuming the resources.
These S.O.B.'s need to get their story straight.
To: glorgau
Even though I don't smoke, I feel that it is the morbidly obese that drive up health care costs more. To say nothing of AIDS, the 100% verified fatal disease.
doesn't exist as far as the taxman and the CDC is concerned.
Isn't PC "science" wonderful?
To: Max McGarrity
I would have guessed the lost productivity was from numerous smoke breaks taken during the work day. What about the real theft by employees of office supplies/company products? It is similar to the ones who throw trash from their car and say it shouldn't matter since it's only one can/wrapper/cup/bag? It adds up.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson