It's a simple case of one version of events being documented with findings, and the other being nothing more than a make believe version devoid of any basis in reality.
Now either you have something to anchor your version of events (the bodies being moved there) in reality, or you're just wasting your breath attacking the only scenario that has anything to back it up.
Funny you didn't think so not so long ago,. I was different from the rest, now its irrelevant? Its irrelevant because its not the so called Walker official point of view . The fact that the BBC caught him lying about his contact with the U.S. State department heavies while running the OSCE right up until Racak really hurts his credibility and you support his view. Your supporting a liar hoplite. Think about it. That’s where you need to begin questioning the reality of it all. Stop trying to rip apart a first hand point of view when all you have are the arranged perceptions and people like the questionable William Walker who presented them. Admit it hoplite, Walker lied to the press, could he be lying about Racak considering the circumstances of his past history. Admit it, you have to agree with this because its a fact. If not you do have a problem. I saw the BBC Documentary and so did the world. A hard bullet to swallow but I know your eggo will not allow you to admit it in any reply. If you want to be objective bring forth the objectivity and park the eggo. If not you are wasting your time.