Stop always asking for proof and for a change convince me that Ranta's so called investigation was a bang up job that incorporated ALL the forensic tests required to make a reliable conclusion. Convince me that her investigation of the scene was done in a timely manor and not over a year and most of all the scene was not subject to contamination? Getting my drift oh Ranta worshipper.
You see Hoplite in order to deal with something that stinks one has to look back into U.S. history a bit. For example the So called Bay of Tonkin incident that opened the door to 50 thousand US soldiers killed in Vietnam. The commies got it all any way and for what. Do you believe the North Vietnamese gunboats actually attacked that US Warship?
What about Richard M. Nixon and his involvement in the Watergate scandal? This was a President of the United States that sanctioned an illegal break-in! Remember the Iran/Contra scandal and the fall guy North? The games a foot then and could it be now? A very valid question. I for one think that the tactics have not changed at all and you are very naïve if you don’t see this. Now taking this into account, is it all possible that William Walker (with his track record) and his quick condemnation of the Serbs who he prematurley named as being responsible for the Racak massacre, was a move by the KLA to open the door for NATO intervention in Kosovo?
Are you going to just stand there and accept Ranta's screwed up forensic examination of the so called Racak Massacre at face value without question? Can you prove that the KLA did not place those bodies in the ditch within the 15 hours they were in control of Racak i.e. Jan. 15/16, 1999 and turn the whole situation to their advantage?
If you can't open your mind to this I honestly do believe that you had voted for Nixon. Over and out.
Learn the rules, Wraith - support your version of events or hang it up.