Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Pope orders talks on US sex scandals
BBC.com/Americas ^ | 15/04/02

Posted on 04/15/2002 12:11:55 PM PDT by history_matters

Pope orders talks on US sex scandals

Pope John Paul II

The Pope has spoken out against "evil" abusers

Pope John Paul II has summoned leaders of the Roman Catholic church in the United States to the Vatican to discuss recent disclosures of sex scandals, which have rocked the church.

The Vatican says the meeting with American cardinals will probably take place next week.

demo

Demonstrators have been calling for Archbishop Law to go

The Archbishops of New York and Boston - traditionally the two most important posts in the Catholic church in the US - have been under pressure to resign because of their alleged role in covering up cases of abuse involving priests.

The Archbishop of Milwaukee has also been accused of suppressing information about cases of alleged abuse.

The Catholic Church has also faced similar allegations in a number of other countries.

The Pope last month made his first public denunciation of guilty priests.

Time for action

Boston Archbishop Cardinal Bernard Law, 70, has been at the epicentre of a scandal in which he is accused of knowing that a few priests in his archdiocese were serial child molesters, but he did not discipline them - he simply moved them from parish to parish where they preyed on new victims.

The affair is similar to problems in St Louis, Florida, California, Philadelphia and Detroit.

Our correspondent says it has severely undermined the credibility of the church and clearly the Vatican now believes it has to take action.

Cardinal Law did not turn up to mass at his cathedral on Sunday because there were protesters outside the cathedral and he thought they would disrupt the service.

Heavy criticism

Across the whole country, 3,000 priests face allegations of child abuse.

law

Archbishop Bernard Law: Under pressure

Cardinal Law has been heavily criticised since former priest John Geoghan was convicted of child molesting.

He has acknowledged that he transferred Geoghan to another parish despite knowing of sexual misconduct allegations against the now-defrocked Boston priest.

Geoghan is believed to have abused more than 100 people over a 20-year period.

The scandals are also a huge financial burden for the church. They have settled out of court in many instances and the cost of that has been more than $1bn.

There is talk that some archdioceses will be bankrupted by the scandals.

Commentators suspect that the Pope will have to get rid of a layer of the Catholic hierarchy, starting with Cardinal Law.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cardinallaw; catholic; catholicbashing; catholiccaucus; catholicchurch; catholiclist; popejohnpaulii; scandal; sexcrimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Gophack
Not to be contrary, but I do not believe that the Catholic Church is the exclusive Church. Never will.
41 posted on 04/15/2002 2:57:03 PM PDT by Malcolm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I figured as much, but I wasn't sure if they were required to learn it or some other "common" language in order to communicate with each other.
42 posted on 04/15/2002 3:00:24 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
You wrote:

I understand that you have major problems with some tenets of the Catholic Church...

And indeed your comment seems kind of foolish, now that you have had MINE removed. (#28)

My point was, simply, that it is the very PREMISE of the Roman Church that has invited the scandal which has now befallen it.

The responsibility is now YOURS for preventing other victims from seeing that.

An awesome responsibility, I would say.

Care to discuss it OPENLY?
43 posted on 04/15/2002 3:35:52 PM PDT by Sola Sola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: goldenstategirl
I just heard on foxnews cable that the authorities might be going to charge Cardinal Law...maybe he will now stay in Rome.
44 posted on 04/15/2002 4:54:29 PM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
If the US bishops act true to form, they will listen politely while the Holy Father speaks, nod their heads, then go away and do whatever it was they intended to do in the first place.

Sigh...that is my fear.

It reminds me of the difference I noticed in how my teenage daughters reacted (as opposed to how I reacted to my parents) when told something they didn't want to hear. My daughters would listen to me patiently, and politely agree with everything I said, "Yes, m'am" and "no, m'am" they would say. Then they would proceed to ignore the directive and do whatever they wanted. They were smart, they knew I couldn't watch them 100% of the time. I, on the other hand, got whacked up side the head a number of times for "smart-mouthing" and arguing with my parents.

45 posted on 04/15/2002 5:02:26 PM PDT by Nubbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: history_matters
Thanks for the ping.
46 posted on 04/15/2002 5:41:52 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
Oh my. This could create some new and interesting possibilities. Will he pack his bags for a one-way trip and find a new job in the Vatican? I hope that if charges are brought he will be sent back to the US. It will create more problems if he is not.
47 posted on 04/15/2002 5:46:24 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: goldenstategirl
The Pope could imprison Law and others at the Vatican. I know others say that is an impossibility, but I somehow think it is more likely than his going to jail in America.
48 posted on 04/15/2002 5:51:28 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: history_matters
That's an interesting thought. If he does, I hope he makes it very clear that's what he's doing so that detractors cannot accuse him of providing sanctuary for possible criminals.
49 posted on 04/15/2002 6:11:00 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: history_matters
I have a gut feeling that the charges are a spin job...just turning the heat up a notch but then again, maybe not.
50 posted on 04/15/2002 6:12:47 PM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church;history_matters
I also hope that strong action comes out of this conference. It would put to rest rumors that he is incapable of leading the Church due to his physical condition.
51 posted on 04/15/2002 6:13:00 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church; catholic_list
To write to the Pope, you can send your letters to:


His Holiness Pope John Paul II
The Apostolic Palace
La Santa Sede
00120 Vatican City
Europe

52 posted on 04/15/2002 6:19:55 PM PDT by history_matters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sola Sola
Actually, I didn't have your post removed. I responded to it, as you can see above.

I have no problem discussing my religion openly. I believe that I responded to your major bone of contention -- that the Catholic Church has no authority. If you would like to refute my argument above, please do so and I will respond as best I can.

God bless.

53 posted on 04/15/2002 6:26:15 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: history_matters
I pray that our Holy Father, guided by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, will not only quickly implement a solution to the abhorrent crisis our Church faces due to the despicable behavior of a small percentage of our clergy, but also heal the victims of this assault, including devout Catholics who may be facing a faith crisis.
54 posted on 04/15/2002 6:28:57 PM PDT by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm
You're not being contrary. I respect everyone's opinion, and enjoy friendly and courteous dialogue.

I didn't say that the Catholic Church was the exclusive church, just that it was the church established by Jesus Christ and has an unbroken line of succession from Peter down to Pope John Paul II. I suppose that could mean "exclusive", but I would prefer to use the word "inclusive" because all are welcome. Since "catholic" means "universal", I suppose that is the best description of the church.

God bless.

55 posted on 04/15/2002 6:29:20 PM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Domestic Church
What makes you think that.
56 posted on 04/15/2002 7:03:09 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: history_matters; catholic_list
The Holy See
His Excellency Gabriele Montalvo
Gabriele Montalvo became ambassador of The Holy See to the United States on Jan. 21, 1999. Ambassador Montalvo was born in Colombia on Jan. 27, 1930, and ordained as a priest for the Archdiocese of Santafe de Bogota on Jan. 18, 1953. After receiving a doctorate in canon law at the Lateran University in Rome, he entered diplomatic service of the Holy See in 1957. From 1964 to 1974, he served as the secretariat of state in the section for Eastern European countries. In 1974, he was appointed apostolic nuncio to Nicaragua and Honduras. In 1982, he was chosen as a member of the papal mediation office for resolving the controversy between Argentina and Chile. Four years later, Montalvo was appointed apostolic pro-nuncio to Yugoslavia, a post he held for 10 years until 1996. On Dec. 7, 1999, Pope John Paul II appointed him apostolic nuncio to the United States.
Embassy of The Holy See
3339 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20008
202-333-7121
fax 202-337-4036




Ambassador Profiles Home
59 posted on 04/15/2002 7:22:12 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
Jesus and his disciples and my Church came BEFORE the scriptures

Really? How is that? Was it not the emperor of Rome, Constantine who wasn't even a Christian, at the time who convened the council at Nicea?

60 posted on 04/15/2002 7:34:11 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson