Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mitchell; keri
It would require very sophisticated equipment
to fill the envelopes
even if was done out in the woods.
There was no trace of anthrax
EVEN ON THE GLUE!!

Do you suppose they had a lab built
somewhere out in the forest?

(Keri, if you are you there somewhere,
I would appreciate your opinion on this)

51 posted on 04/14/2002 10:25:13 PM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Nogbad
It would require very sophisticated equipment to fill the envelopes even if was done out in the woods. There was no trace of anthrax EVEN ON THE GLUE!!

This is new to me (about the glue). How can the glue not have gotten contaminated if the envelopes were porous enough to let spores through? Wouldn't some spores have gotten on the glue that way?

Also, how would they have put the spores in the envelopes and then sealed them, without disturbing the spores enough for some to bounce and get stuck on the glue? (These are the same uncharged spores that fly easily and don't clump.)

Maybe the spores were placed in the envelopes while still inside some other sealed container? The envelopes would then be sealed, and the inner container would then be destroyed from outside, or maybe the inner container was made of a material that disintegrated. (This is a bit too much like Maxwell Smart, but it could be done.)

Do you suppose they had a lab built somewhere out in the forest?

I'm not convinced that it takes a complex lab to fill envelopes, or to put sealed containers inside envelopes. Certainly the requirements are much less than what's needed to prepare the anthrax spores in the first place.

And there are vast open spaces in the U.S. Mohamed Atta did a lot of traveling in Summer, 2001, for some unknown purpose.

Notice that, after the envelopes were opened, the subsequent contamination was limited. Only a small number of people were infected in a building, and adjacent buildings were not affected at all. (There appear to be only two exceptions to this -- Kathy Nguyen and Ottilie Lundgren.) If the envelopes were filled while on, say, a 50-acre tract, there would be no obvious contamination even if the terrorists had been a bit sloppy.

56 posted on 04/15/2002 1:53:13 AM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Nogbad
My opinion? Presumably the perps who mailed the anthrax knew what they were handling.

Even assuming they had vaccinations and prophylactic antibiotics (and that is a fair assumption) every precaution would have been taken.

I think the envelopes were filled in the lab where the spores were produced. There was no charge on the spores, so the question in my mind is not where the envelopes were filled, but how the perps managed to get these spores into the envelopes. Some kind of negative pressure system and a glove-box would be needed, at the least.

It is absurd to think someone could fill paper envelopes with *this* anthrax outside a lab where conditions are not predictable or under control.

57 posted on 04/15/2002 9:01:11 AM PDT by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson