Replies

I already did prove it a dozen times when FR was covering the JFK assassination.

You & fred25 only 'proved', - on the JFK threads, - that your blind faith in Warren Commission conclusions is every bit as kooky as some of the wilder conspiracy theorists.

MR's problem is that he even tries to defend the obvious lies. It's one thing to claim evidence that no one can check, but when he's caught with his hand in the cookie jar, he doesn't admit to even that, like a pathological liar. Take good look at his statements covering the Assassination. You should find all the discrepancies you want.

I'll not defend MR, -- but your claims of 'triumph' over him can also be viewed as 'obvious lies', using your own self same reasoning.

-- As you say, it's all there on the FR threads, in everyones statements, -- your discrepancies, as well as Riveras .

Only one thing has been absolutely proven to date in the JFK assassination. -- No one knows/tells the truth of what happened, - and least of all the official government version.

I didn't mention the Warren Commission which seems to be the first thing the tinfoil crowd mentions. You forgot that since I live here, the Dallas Morning News interviews people who were major participants once a year in November during the anniversary date. Fred25 bought a Carcano and knows the handling characteristics of it. I would trust him to know more about Carcanos than MR or you any day.

You & fred25 only 'proved', - on the JFK threads, - that your blind faith in Warren Commission conclusions is every bit as kooky as some of the wilder conspiracy theorists.

Newsflash! People who think Oswald acted alone don't have to have "faith" in the WC. It is perfectly possible to reach that conclusion based on the evidence.