[tpaine]

Your untruthful statements are documented on this thread.

Hogwash. Post these statements, in context, & explain how they are 'untruthful'.

You can't, & won't, because they don't exist.

-- You are out of control, - why?

[mlo]

OK, you asked. Each of your following statements is a falsehood. The proof of such has been provided. If you insist I will go back and collate that too.

"And of course, Fred's rifle should also have a six-groove barrel, as per the markings on one bullet supposedly recovered from a stretcher at Parkland Hospital."

"Even the warren report admits the problems with oswalds rifle, & its inability to perform as needed without a 'magic bullet' scenario."

"-- That oswalds rifle was a piece of junk should be beyond argument. -- The WC admitted the scope was misaligned, & the action to slow to shoot in the time alloted."

"It [the scope] was initialy installed improperly, according to the WC report."

"you deliberatly ignore the time factor of an inherently 'slow' action, that made the 'magic bullet' a necessary fiction."

"The Warren report could not correlate the filmed record of shots hitting JFK with the time necessary to operate oswalds rifles action. This made necessary the 'magic bullet' that hit the Gov after it hit JFK."

"The WC was forced to the above 'magic bullet' conclusion because one shot missed."

"Your 'logic' wordplay attempted to make a point not in dispute."