Web Site Mocking Conspiracy Nut Michael Rivero Launched

Anti Rivero Site ^

[Republican_Strategist]

A HREF="http://whatreallyhappened.tripod.com/ ">Anti Rivero web site


Here’s a web site that is going after Michael Rivero’s conspiracy web site whatreallyhappened.com

[Shooter 2.5]

I called him what I thought was accurate and not a loon and I don't appreciate someone, especially you, calling me that. The Dallas Morning News interviews people who were there without the benefit of the Warren Commission, the commission that you continued to mention in every post. The last interview was with Oswald's landlord. If you're such an expert of the validity of that interview, suppose you inlighten all of us and tell us when you read that article. If you fired a Carcano, evidently you didn't learn anything from the experience.

[Osinski]

The problem with Michael Rivero is that he challenged the limited mindset of many here. The most virulent of the Rivero bashers cannot think outside the box, and his theories, conspiracies and research pushed the limits of their willingness to consider something other than what they've been told. It is much easier to be a sheeple. No thinking required.

[takenoprisoner]

Their characteristics are well known, and Oswalds, in particular, was a piece of junk incapable of performing as the Warren Report claimed. - That is an established fact, which you blindly deny in your loony way.

Sorry for the intrusion on these rifles but I saw a pic recently showing Oswald amongst others at street level in the doorway of the book depository building as Kennedy was being shot. The pic while having to be blown up as it was shot front a distance during the shooting matched the features of Oswalds face, build, and the shirt and jacket he was wearing when arrested. Best I could tell it was credible. And to the best of my recollection I saw it on an A&E or PBS program. Perhaps someone here will have seen this too?

[Buckeroo]

It's in process. Sorry sink. I make announcements only after I know capability.

[AppyPappy]

What research? He relied on data that merely supported his position, whether true or not.

[AppyPappy]

The problem with Michael Rivero is that he challenged the limited mindset of many here.

The problem with Rivero is that he played people for a sucker. I used to run a conspiracy site. Most of it is smoke and mirrors.

[tpaine]

I called him what I thought was accurate and not a loon and I don't appreciate someone, especially you, calling me that.

-- Tough. - I'm being accurate in calling you a loon & a fraud, - using your own critera that you used on Rivera.

The Dallas Morning News interviews people who were there without the benefit of the Warren Commission, the commission that you continued to mention in every post. The last interview was with Oswald's landlord.

Again, -- SO WHAT? Your inane repetitions about the DMN add nothing to refute the fact that you blindly accept the Warren Report as your 'tinfoil gospel' on JFK's assassination.

If you're such an expert of the validity of that interview, suppose you inlighten all of us and tell us when you read that article.

Whoa! -- YOU claimed to be the JFK expert that proved MikeR to be a 'fraud'. -- That is proven to be BS. - By your own words, - here & now.

If you fired a Carcano, evidently you didn't learn anything from the experience.

- That is 'evident'? -- Why? -- [It's only evident you are really reaching for a snappy comeback, poor fella]

[Sir Gawain]

Compunction was Word of the Day on February 6, 2000.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Anyone know why this guy was banned? Or if he was?

[Roscoe]

I will tell you what I am going to do. No expenses spared, A REAL FREEREPUBLIC

A paid GeoCities account?

[takenoprisoner]

What research? He relied on data that merely supported his position, whether true or not.

I always say let the chips fall where they may. What's credible and what's incredible is often in the eyes of the beholder. I just try to keep an open mind while some folks with minds already made-up refuse to even glance upon the alternate possibilities. You may know some like that.

I'm not making judgments about Michaels research. Just stating that he did his homework. His personal biases like any other investigators' can and may play a role in the results. Objectivism is rare from what I have experienced in life. Perhaps your experience is different. You see, there we go.

[Buckeroo]

I am banned.

[Lazamataz]

You're not gonna do jack, Buck.

Boy that Jack fellow shore does get done a lot.

[Buckeroo]

err .. Jim ... you step in upon issues that show the sensitivity of a maggot.

[Buckeroo]

I met you once. You are a drunk. Nice tee-tottler but you never say anything worthwhile to discuss issues about America.

[It'salmosttolate]

Micheal is a little of everything mentioned on this thread but I saw him as someone seeking the truth.

I could tell by the fact that he used his real name. Hey Buckeroo do you think Republican_Strategist will let us know what his real name is?

[Buckeroo]

WE BELIEVE IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND ALL OTHER MUTHERS MUST BE REMOVED!

[restornu]

I am confussed John Birch is taboo which is Anti-Commie,
and Michael Rivero is anti-American?

and FreeRepublic dose not want
Birch or Rivero to voice opinion on FR?

Is this right?

[tpaine]

err .. Jim ... you step in upon issues that show the sensitivity of a maggot.

----------------------------

Errr.. Buck ... Are you saying roscoes real name is Jim .. Maggot?

[Buckeroo]

I am getting really tired of the management policy upon FR.