Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New smallpox terror alert
ThisisLondon ^ | April 12, 2002 | Malcolm Withers and Patrick Hennessy

Posted on 04/12/2002 10:30:09 AM PDT by My Identity

New smallpox terror alert

by Malcolm Withers and Patrick Hennessy

A major terrorist alert was sparked today after it emerged the Government has bought 30 million anti-smallpox vaccines, enough to protect half Britain's population from a biological attack.

Ministers have spent £32 million bolstering defences against the disease, after a review in the wake of the 11 September assault on the US pinpointed glaring deficiencies in Britain's shield against germ warfare.

Today's deal with British company Powder-Ject Pharmaceuticals will help replenish stockpiles so that, within 12 months, health chiefs will have enough vaccine to protect at least half the population - more if the doses are divided up.

Government officials rushed to make it clear that the order did not mean Britain was immediately being put on a higher state of alert against a biological attack. However, both the US and Russia have already stockpiled anti-smallpox vaccines.

There have been credible reports that Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime has acquired supplies of smallpox, as have other rogue nations, and there are fears that the al Qaeda terrorist network could also have obtained the virus.

Whitehall stuck to the line it has held since 11 September, that while all necessary precautions were being taken, there is no specific, credible threat to Britain, and no evidence of an imminent large-scale terrorist assault on the country.

A Health Department spokesman said today: "As part of the Government's continuing vigilance against international terrorism we have acquired supplies of smallpox vaccine. There is no credible threat but it is important for the Government to take all necessary steps to ensure the protection of the population."

It was being pointed out, however, that there were specific fears earlier this year that Britain did not have adequate protection against the threat of smallpox, which is more contagious and deadly than anthrax.

Smallpox has a fatality rate of 30 per cent or more when used as a biological weapon, according to US public health research. While it was effectively eradicated worldwide in 1977, it has long been feared as the most devastating of all infectious disease.

After 1977 some supplies of smallpox were held at heavily guarded laboratories in both the former Soviet Union and the US. However, it has long been suspected that samples have been smuggled out and have fallen into the hands of international terrorists.

Tony Blair has repeatedly warned of the dangers of not taking action against regimes which have the potential to develop weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological materials.

Only last weekend the issue was high on the agenda as he held talks with President George W Bush in Texas. Mr Blair's tough line on Iraq has led him into trouble with Labour MPs, who are protesting against moves to take military action.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: biowarfare; britain; iraq; smallpox; smallpoxlist; terro; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2002 10:30:09 AM PDT by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thud
ping
2 posted on 04/12/2002 10:32:44 AM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Identity; *Smallpox List
Why so much press in the US and the UK over smallpox vaccines?? This is way beyond standard security measures.
3 posted on 04/12/2002 10:33:09 AM PDT by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: My Identity
New smallpox terror alert

Government officials rushed to make it clear that the order did not mean Britain was immediately being put on a higher state of alert against a biological attack

These writers must work for Reuters.

5 posted on 04/12/2002 10:41:59 AM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
No kidding. I about peed in my pants when I saw that title. =(
6 posted on 04/12/2002 10:55:05 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
Why so much press in the US and the UK over smallpox vaccines?? This is way beyond standard security measures.

Because if terrorists were to launch a smallpox outbreak, the vaccine could mean the difference between life and death for thousands if not millions of people.

7 posted on 04/12/2002 10:56:48 AM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
A note in the headline that this was from the UK would've been appropriate.

MM

8 posted on 04/12/2002 11:08:46 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
It seems to me that any smallpox outbreak would be a much bigger catastrophe in countries like Pakistan, China & India than in industrialized nations where we have at least some vaccine, and have modern sanitation. Even if they hit New York, it might well end up in Central Asia within hours.

If it hit Israel, the Israelis would be much more capable of dealing with it than the Palestinians, and it just might wipe out the Palestinian population. Islamic terrorists just might score an own-goal with something like this. Of course, they can always blame it on the Mossad.

9 posted on 04/12/2002 11:11:53 AM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
It seems to me that any smallpox outbreak would be a much bigger catastrophe in countries like Pakistan, China & India than in industrialized nations where we have at least some vaccine, and have modern sanitation

While this true, it really would not be big of a problem here in the US, Europe, or Israel at all. I would estimate the the dz would do very minimal damage to any industrialized country, even those without access to vaccine who quarantine properly. You're only infective once the fever starts, and most people at this point are in such bad shape, so quickly, they'll be at a medical facility, not at the mall spreading the virus.

10 posted on 04/12/2002 11:22:55 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tellw
the vaccine could mean the difference between life and death for thousands if not millions of people.

Young people mainly.

Vaccinia vaccine is a highly effective immunizing agent that enabled the global eradication of smallpox. The last naturally occurring case of smallpox occurred in Somalia in 1977. In May 1980, the World Health Assembly certified that the world was free of naturally occurring smallpox (5). By the 1960s, because of vaccination programs and quarantine regulations, the risk for importation of smallpox into the United States had been reduced. As a result, recommendations for routine smallpox vaccination were rescinded in 1971 (6). In 1976, the recommendation for routine smallpox vaccination of health-care workers was also discontinued (7). In 1982, the only active licensed producer of vaccinia vaccine in the United States discontinued production for general use, and in 1983, distribution to the civilian population was discontinued (8). All military personnel continued to be vaccinated, but that practice ceased in 1990. Since January 1982, smallpox vaccination has not been required for international travelers, and International Certificates of Vaccination forms no longer include a space to record smallpox vaccination (9).

We require children to be vaccinated against chickenpox. A reversal of priorities.

11 posted on 04/12/2002 11:41:23 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
Things only make sense if time goes backwards, as Martin Amis so brilliantly showed in Time's Arrow.

1. Smallpox is rampant, having been caused intentionally.
2. There is no more smallpox.
3. There is some smallpox, but at least it wasn't caused intentionally.

12 posted on 04/12/2002 12:07:33 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Because if terrorists were to launch a smallpox outbreak

I realise, that. But the US and UK have not said anything about the bug being out in the "wild". Presumably the US stock is under very tight security. That implies that Putin told Bush that Russia couldn't guarantee the security of its stock. Perhaps even that Russia knew its security had been breached. Not to be alarmist, but the smallpox vaccine issue seems to have a very significant priority for the US/UK, exceeding that for Anthrax antibiotics, botulism, or any other bioagents. I'm not aware of any acquisition program in the 100 million dose range for any other vaccine, antibiotic, prophylactic, etc. Since smallpox is supposed to be the least accessible, the level of attention it gets is quite bothersome.
13 posted on 04/12/2002 12:15:31 PM PDT by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
A note in the headline

Sorry. I thought the source was sufficient. I keep forgetting that some people use the sidebars exclusively.
14 posted on 04/12/2002 12:17:28 PM PDT by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
Just out of interest: I was vaccinated as a child in the late 60's or early 70's, of course. I understand that that vaccination may not have much effectiveness anymore. While in basic training, we were re-vaccinated for a variety of diseases. Some of the guys got a shot that caused a huge sore on their arm - would that be a smallpox vaccination? If so, does it cause as nasty a reaction in people who have been previously vaccinated (I didn't get that shot in basic)? Anyone know?
15 posted on 04/12/2002 12:22:44 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
The big sore on the arm, if it was smallpox, would have formed a scab, and evenrtually a light flattish smooth and somewhat circular mark...

If you were vaccinated as a child, and aren't too old, you should have one on your arm or your thigh. Many times girls were innoculated on their thighs so they could wear sleeveless blouses and dresses without the scar showing on their upper arm.

16 posted on 04/12/2002 1:05:18 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jacquej
Yeah, that's what I thought. I was vaccinated as a child, and they had the record of it, which was why I was not vaccinated in basic. The scar is very difficult to see now (I'm 35), but when I was younger it could be seen pretty easily. When done to adults, at least, it's really quite a nasty sore/scab for a while.
17 posted on 04/12/2002 1:37:07 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
Yes, if you were reimmunized against smallpox more than 10 years after your first vaccine dose, you are likely to have lifetime immunity. You should be on the frontline of the biological defenses against small pox. I hope you have medical training!

It's really IDIOTIC and STUPID to have dosages of vaccine sitting around, yet healthcare workers can not immunize themselves. WE ARE THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY TARGETS, but DASCHLE's DUMMIES won't let market forces rule in healthcare.

18 posted on 04/12/2002 2:01:19 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My Identity
Not to be alarmist, but the smallpox vaccine issue seems to have a very significant priority for the US/UK, exceeding that for Anthrax antibiotics, botulism, or any other bioagents...Since smallpox is supposed to be the least accessible, the level of attention it gets is quite bothersome.

I'll agree that there does seem to a bit much dramatic press about it. However, I'm pretty certain it's a larger concern than Anthrax/Botulism and the others just because it's highly contagious, while the others aren't spread person to person. So a couple envelopes of smallpox could do far more damage (rhetorically - I don't think smallpox could survive outside the body like Anthrax spores, so I= don't think it would be launched by mail).
19 posted on 04/12/2002 6:02:07 PM PDT by pragmatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pragmatic
I'm pretty certain it's a larger concern than Anthrax/Botulism and the others just because it's highly contagious,

And nuclear bombs have a bigger impact than C4, but you don't see/hear the guvmint handing out potassium iodide pills and talking about fallout shelters. Why? Because the threat assessment is still pretty low.

Likewise, because smallpox is supposed to be so very rare, the threat assessment should be quite low.

But the guvmint seems to me to be taking smallpox very seriously. And, therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that the guvmint's assessment of the threat is very very high. Since our stocks are presumably secure, the other source is Russia...
20 posted on 04/12/2002 6:17:02 PM PDT by My Identity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson