Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Trade Secret Indictments
AP, via Asia Times ^ | 11 April 2002 | AP

Posted on 04/11/2002 10:23:35 PM PDT by Vigilant1

The Associated Press, Thu 11 Apr 2002

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — The three Chinese nationals accused of stealing trade secrets from Lucent Technologies also victimized four other companies, according to a new indictment returned Thursday.

The three men, including two scientists who worked at Lucent's Murray Hill headquarters, now face 24 counts, including the original conspiracy charge, 14 counts of possessing trade secrets, and nine counts of wire fraud.

They were first charged in May with plotting a joint venture with Datang Telecom Technology Co. Ltd., of Beijing.

The trio planned to become ``the Cisco of China'' by selling a clone of Lucent's PathStar data and voice transmission system to Internet providers in that nation, prosecutors claimed.

The new indictment said trade secrets were stolen not only from Lucent, but from companies that licensed portions of their software to Lucent or sold Lucent custom circuit boards for use in the PathStar server.

It named as victims Telenetworks, a unit of Next Level Communication, of Rohnert Park, Calif.; NetPlane Systems Inc. (formerly Harris & Jeffries Inc.), a subsidiary of Mindspeed Technologies, of Dedham, Mass.; Hughes Software Systems Ltd., a division of Hughes Network Systems Inc., of Gurgaon, India; and ZiaTech Corp., a subsidiary of Intel Corp., of San Luis Obispo, Calif.

Lucent fired the scientists after their arrests in May. Hai Lin, 30, of Scotch Plains, and Kai Xu, 33, of Somerset, had been on the Lucent staff developing PathStar for the telecommunications giant that was once part of AT&T Corp.

The third man, Yong-Qing Cheng, 37, of East Brunswick, was fired after his arrest from Village Networks, an optical networking vendor in Eatontown. He had worked as a consultant to Lucent on PathStar.

All have pleaded innocent and are free on bail.

Despite the additional charges, Assistant U.S. Attorney Scott S. Christie said he would not seek to delay the trial, scheduled for Sept. 24.

Cheng lawyer James A. Plaisted said the trial would likely come later. He said that defense lawyers expected the additional charges because the U.S. attorney's office had said it would make more specific accusations.

The conspiracy charge carries up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, as does each of the trade secret possession counts. Each wire fraud count carries up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Datang has asserted it ``always follows the laws and regulations about intellectual patents.''

The three defendants, all legal U.S. residents, formed a company called ComTriad in January 2000. It formed a partnership controlled by Datang called DTNET about February 2001, which was funded with $1.2 million from Datang, the indictment said.

Prosecutors have said a substantial amount of the PathStar source code was sent to Datang.

Lucent said it discontinued the PathStar system in early 2001, shortly before discovering the theft and alerting authorities.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: asiasinouswatch; china; chinastuff; espionagelist; freetrade; industrialespionage; zanupf
I guess 'free trade' with China means they will sell us the technology they've stolen from us and produced with gulag labor. Welcome to the global market.
1 posted on 04/11/2002 10:23:35 PM PDT by Vigilant1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Vigilant1
Why didn't they just ask one of the Clintons for it?! That would have saved them time, money and JAIL!
3 posted on 04/11/2002 10:40:19 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Because they neglected to donate to the campaign, that's why.
4 posted on 04/11/2002 10:41:57 PM PDT by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory
Why didn't I think of that?! DUHH!
5 posted on 04/11/2002 10:44:17 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson