Replies

As a creationist, I concur that you have refined the analogy with that 'all from the same maker' bit.

I also think that this study is a point in favor of special creation of humans. See my #14 where a quote from the other story about this study highlights this. They are evolutionists so they call it "special evolution". I guess that is what they call evolution that they have no other explanation for, but count on them to scream 'its not science' every time we say the evidence points to special creation.

This has been a growing puzzle ever since the 1980s, when scientists first started looking into the genomes of different organisms and were shocked to discover that a fruit fly, for instance, has many of the same genes as a human. In fact, all living things share the same genes. Mice share 85-90 percent of their genes with us, cows 80 percent, fruit flies 61 percent and bananas 50 percent. How do these common genes make such vastly different organisms on the one hand and, on the other, why isn't the chimp more like us, with an ability to think, talk and create?

When we dare to look at the big picture and use scientific deductive reasoning, Intelligent Design is a very logical conclusion. We like to pretend that we have more knowledge than we actually have or even understand.

To use deductive reasoning to determine that there is no intelligence behind our very own intelligence should make Dawkins laugh. Instead the selfish gene mocks the god that he claims to be…