Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bernard Marx
As for removing the signature, isn't that what the story said he was asking the Senate for?

President Bush did not have to go to congress to remove the signature. What the article referred to was that Congress refused to even consider ratification of the agreement when Clinton signed it first, back in December. President Bush had both the ability and power to remove the signature - or at the very least come out with a public statement saying it was null and void in his eyes. But he refused to do either.

15 posted on 04/11/2002 11:52:50 AM PDT by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: fogarty
I did mis-read the article. Thanks.
16 posted on 04/11/2002 12:09:17 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: fogarty
RE:President Bush had both the ability and power to remove the signature - or at the very least come out with a public statement saying it was null and void in his eyes. But he refused to do either
 
exactly.
34 posted on 04/13/2002 1:44:23 PM PDT by tomakaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson