Posted on 04/10/2002 1:41:12 PM PDT by weegee
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:07 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Nearly a century ago, the music industry argued that its future was threatened by a new method of creating and distributing multiple copies of a performed song.
The new technology? The player piano roll.
Two decades ago, the movie industry fought against an innovative device that it claimed was as dangerous as the Boston Strangler: Sony's Betamax videocassette recorder.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
I say if 28 years was enough when the average man lived perhaps twice that then it is still enough now, when artists have longer productive lives (can create more works).
The greed of the entertainment moguls is legendary but the quality is not!!!
In fact, it's not (generally) the artists themselves -- it's the middlemen who see their business model eroding out from under them.
You raise an excellent point, though. Copyright law (like law generally) depends on the perception that it is fair and beneficial to people generally. Once it is seen as a special favor to some faction that bribed the politicians, it is cast into contempt.
In this particular case, if people are forced to break the law to do perfectly legitimate and reasonable things (e.g. compile favorite songs from a dozen CDs in their collection onto a single mix CD for convenient listening), then their resistance to breaking related laws for less justified purposes (e.g. bootlegging copies of somebody else's CDs) is lowered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.