Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Registered
LOL, can we do that?

I'm not sure. Does it say anywhere that we can't?

5 posted on 04/10/2002 1:24:15 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"I'm not sure. Does it say anywhere that we can't?"

Wasn't it first done in 1836?

10 posted on 04/10/2002 1:32:57 PM PDT by cibco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic
I'm not sure. Does it say anywhere that we can't?

Unfortunately, there is, Art. IV, Sec. 3 of the US Constitution. Unless you can get Congress to go along. Although there might be a loophole in the language that would allow it, but don't hold your breath on the Courts allowing that loophole, even if people in the to be incorpated areas held a vote.

That secion was violated with the creation of West Virgina out of Virgina,unless Virgina wasn't a state at the time, in which case the Union Army was off conquering a foreign country, not putting down a "rebellion". Of course Lincoln got it both ways, having the Confederate states be in rebellion and yet carving W. Va. out of Va.

Moving the Texas borders would almost by definition mean increasing the percentage of liberals, so just having the not liberals moving to Texas would seem a better idea.

34 posted on 04/10/2002 3:38:16 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson