To: friendly
You couldn't have rephrased my thoughts better. And what's REALLY disgusting, is that in another context it would strike one as absolutely hilarious, is liberals claim everything they do is for the children. I can't believe a lowlife like Elders thinks an adult sexually touching a child can be good for the children. Surely she hasn't heard of reputable studies that have demonstrated a proven link between childhood sexual abuse and children growing up to become molesters themselves? Isn't that reason enough not abuse a child's mind and body and to allow our children to grow up to be themselves with safe and happy childhoods? Yes, sexuality is rampant in the adult culture, but that's no reason to expose children to it. Elders' writing a foreword to such an EVIL book is simply additional evidence an M.D degree means doctors, like an authority, can sometimes be wrong. And this woman is simply, plainly wrong about the existence of a sexual attraction perforce between adults and children. It may well exist, but its still WRONG and moreover its ILLEGAL. Someone should explain the facts of life to Dr. Elders as O'Reilly's attempts to get them through seemed wasted on her.
To: goldstategop
To democrat cockroaches like the borderline psychotic Clinton stooge Joycelyn Elders, NAMBLA sex with children is enlightened, but the Boy Scouts must be destroyed.
Just what kind of special interest groups are these DNC vermin pandering to these days anyway?
26 posted on
04/09/2002 8:05:37 PM PDT by
friendly
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson