To: mikeb704
My long-term goal is that Clinton is ranked below both Richard Nixon and Andrew Johnson as the worst president ever.
His administration was more corrupt than Harding's or Grant's, which was perhaps the most corrupt administration since Jackson's. But both Jackson (whom I detest) and Grant (whom i admire) were genuine war heros and men of courage and personal honor. Their naivete led them to trust corrupt "friends" and to be used by them - shame on the corrupters not on the men they misled.
Clinton on the other hand was the chief corrupt boil on the body politic, the master prestidigitaror and mountebank, the source of the putresence that permeated the government during his vile rule.
But, I don't want to get started and tell you how I really feel about Slick....
To: CatoRenasci
actually, in terms of indictments/convictions of members of an administration, Ronald Reagan's counts as the most corrupt of the last century. U.S. Grant's as the most corrupt ever. if you're interested in facts. Clinton's administration may have been greatly "investigated", but that means little, as none of the investigations turned up proof of actual indictable crimes, and in the U.S., you are innocent until proven guilty.
To: CatoRenasci
I don't understand all your adjectives, but they sure look nasty. And, nasty brings to mind the Clintons. I agree with the author, I hate them too.
To: CatoRenasci
hey at least nixon wasn't a traitor!
To: CatoRenasci
My long-term goal is that Clinton is ranked below both Richard Nixon and Andrew Johnson as the worst president ever.Clinton was a much more worse president then Richard Nixon was. He was in fact the worst president.
That IMHO, and I stick by it.
41 posted on
04/09/2002 7:08:00 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: CatoRenasci
Jacksonville killed a lawyer in a duel during the period between his election and his inauguration -- how can you not like that?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson