I only caught the end of it. I thought people would like to know about this. She argued that the book (I forget its title) doesn't argue for pedophilia, and O'Reilly disagreed. They also talked about abstinence education, which she said should be "suplemented" with other stuff. (these are paraphrases of course).
They also talked about abstinence education, which she said should be "suplemented" with other stuff. (these are paraphrases of course). I agree with your paraphrasing!!!!
while she agrees that teaching abstinence is OK - apparently the book calls for NO teaching of it, or at least that was the impression I got from O'Reilly.
Elders didn't appreciate much of what he had to say about the book. She jumped on him for reading 'sentences" instead of paragraphs. I got the impression she never read the book at all.