Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California pushing to rework power deals :Calpine reportedly near new terms
The Oakland Tribune ^ | Saturday, April 06, 2002 - 3:13:39 AM MST | Jennifer Coleman The Associated Press

Posted on 04/06/2002 9:47:32 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

SACRAMENTO -- Through complaints to the federal government and a mobilized cadre of lawyers, the state of California is trying to shed some of the long-term power contracts tying it to much higher than market rates.

When he made the deals last year, Gov. Gray Davis called them a force to stabilize the state's volatile energy market. Later, however, the state began trying a variety of tactics to poke holes in those contracts and get a better deal.

But that is happening in a tenuous utility environment in which many companies are wallowing in Enron-related accounting problems and trying to stabilize their sagging finances.

San Jose-based Calpine Corp. has four of the 56 long-term contracts with the state, worth about $11.7 billion of the $43 billion total. Those deals have Calpine set to provide about 25 percent of the power.

But the Department of Water Resources has been negotiating hard with Calpine to change the terms. Both sides said Friday they had no deal.

"We are close, but we've been close before," said department spokesman Oscar Hidalgo.

Since the deals were signed, Calpine has faltered. Standard & Poor's downgraded its credit rating to junk status, because of its large debts and concerns renegotiated energy deals with the state could cut badly needed revenues.

That means Calpine really has nothing to offer the state, said University of California, Irvine, economist Peter Navarro. Any new deal the state would reach with Calpine would have little meaning.

Calpine, spokesman Bill Highlander said, still is 'very stable."

The state started buying power in January 2001, after three utilities amassed billions of dollars in debt due to high wholesale costs and could not buy energy for their customers. Davis said the long-term deals tamed the market and provided reliable supplies.

But wholesale electricity prices have dropped since to less than half the $69 per megawatt hour average of the long-term deals, leading critics to say the state was rolled by the power companies and stuck consumers with a decade of high prices.

In February, the state asked the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to review some of the deals, saying the power sellers charged unfair prices and used illegal tactics to drive them higher. The state Electricity Oversight Board and the Public Utilities Commission want the contracts' costs cut by $21 million.

Energy sellers say the contracts are fair given the cost of energy at the time. Jan Smutny-Jones, executive director of the Independent Energy Producers, said the state has buyer's remorse, which is discouraging companies from investing in California.

Also, fallout from the collapse of bankrupt energy giant Enron is making it hard for generators to find money to build power plants, Smutny-Jones said. That could lead to another energy crunch in two or three years.

Concern over a future shortage of generation is why the state tied about 70 percent of the long-term contracts to the building of new plants, Hidalgo said.

Whether the contracts actually require energy companies to build a plant is open to interpretation. A recent Bureau of State Audits report found the contracts "typically do not impose the substantial penalty of termination for failure to build such generation."

That hasn't stopped DWR attorneys from telling Sempra Energy Resources, which holds a $7 billion deal, that it hasn't lived up to its contract and may lose it because it hadn't brought a 300-megawatt power plant online by April.

Sempra responded by saying that plant could have been part of a larger, cleaner facility being built in Bakersfield. Sempra just decided not to operate the smaller plant while the larger one was being built, spokesman Tom Murnane said.

Also, Murnane said, the contract doesn't require Sempra to build anything, while the state claims the contract requires the company to have the plant working now.

In fact, Hidalgo said, the promised new plant was the reason the state agreed to pay Sempra $160 a megawatt hour.

Sempra president Michael Niggli said the state is just playing "political games" to break the contract.

Sheldon Shultz, the owner of a biomass plant in Soledad, agreed.

The DWR canceled a five-year, $35 million contract with Soledad Energy last week, saying the company had only supplied 30 percent of the power they were supposed to sell the state in the last several months.

A mechanical problem has slowed production at the plant, Shultz said, and would have been fixed soon.

Instead, he said, the state gave him a "take-it-or-leave-it offer" that would cut Soledad's rate to below cost. That's because of "the political pressure on the governor and the governor's pressure on the agency to do something."

Among California's power woes, his 13-megawatt biomass plant "isn't on anyone's radar," he said, but since the state is his only customer, he shut the plant down and laid off 21 workers. "We're a mouse in a battle of elephants and I guess we didn't get out of the way."

-----

On the Net:

The Department of Water Resources:

The California Energy Commission:

Sempra Energy Resources:

Calpine Corp.:


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; calpine; calpowercrisis; davis; powercontracts; powercrisis

1 posted on 04/06/2002 9:47:32 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ;Calpowercrisis;randita;SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; quimby...
Calpowercrisis:
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Calpowercrisis, click below:
  click here >>> Calpowercrisis <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



2 posted on 04/06/2002 9:49:23 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks for these updates.

Do you suspect this is one of Davis' last ditch efforts to save his reelection or are there still some adults left among the California civil servants?

3 posted on 04/06/2002 9:56:26 AM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
But wholesale electricity prices have dropped since to less than half the $69 per megawatt hour average of the long-term deals, leading critics to say the state was rolled by the power companies and stuck consumers with a decade of high prices.

So Gray Davis and all the other fuzzy minded idiots in California screw themselves by passing legislation which tied the hands of the power companies, then when everything goes to hell in a hand-basket because there isn't enough power these same idiots make terrible long term deals to get themselves out of the fix they created, and then when the pressure is off they renig on their deals or cry they need to renegotiate. I'm sorry but tough luck.

Too bad that isn't how things work in America anymore. Government will dictate the solution to this problem. Just like it created the original problem. And when things don't go as expected again, the politicians will find another scapegoat for their lunacy. It only gets worse from here folks. Bye-bye America.

4 posted on 04/06/2002 10:00:05 AM PST by ridensm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If California negotiates a new deal, does it mean that the freinds, relatives and hangers-on of Governor Blackout Davis have to return the bribes, payoffs, and kickbacks they might already have received or do they get them anew based on the value of the new deal? Conditit's kids, for example, appear to now longer be on the STATE payroll, yet, it would seem to be most unfair to them to not include them onsome basis, in the new pie, if for no other reason than to keep them quiet. Many of the other insiders in Sacremento will double dip on this, so, let's be fair (in the democrap sense).
5 posted on 04/06/2002 10:03:29 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
LOL!
6 posted on 04/06/2002 10:07:17 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
I am sure that very little happens in the California Bureacracy with out Davis having a hand in it!
7 posted on 04/06/2002 10:09:39 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson