Reread the actual warrant and not the press report. It will merely say that he's been convicted of a crime that could be punished by more than one year in jail. The part about him being a felon is the newspaper reporter's mistake, same as the "pipe bomb" possession charge (it's actually "bomb preparation material").
Not to mention the expost facto nature of the govts. action in cases like this; he WAS NOT A FELON; HE LIED TO NO ONE regrading possesion of firearms or concealed carry. And you don't have a problem with this?
Poohbaaaah; is that some kind of sheep or is it code word for govt. shill.
sui