Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jadimov
10% is sure better than any rate higher than 10%! The problem is getting the needed spending cuts enacted.

Further, revenue neutrality is required.

The 23% tax inclusive is revenue neutral ... and would lead to spending/tax cuts by pols who want to be reelected. And you know how pols want to be reelected!

101 posted on 03/31/2002 5:33:14 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
...revenue neutrality is required...
...would lead to spending/tax cuts by pols who want to be reelected...

I don't trust the politicians to lower the rate on their own. If they could be trusted, we wouldn't be in the mess we are in. The tax change must be locked into a Constitutional Amendment. The 16th must be repealed. The new rate must be locked at 10%. Revenue neutrality would be part of the transition with a mandated decrease every year until 10% is achieved.

104 posted on 03/31/2002 5:48:03 PM PST by jadimov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson