Replies

There's probably a lot more I passed over. Some might have been like Audie Murphy or Aldo Ray, who became actors AFTER the war. Like the others, it speaks to the morality of the time. Today, a war hero of Murphy's caliber would never get in the door at many production companies. He'd be regarded with suspicion, at best, instead of with respect. A man who had actually killed so many people, even in heroic wartime action, would be an object of fear and loathing to those who run Hollywood. As I said, such men are as living examples of what typical Hollywood denizens are not.

IMHO, most of the flip-flop to the current belief system occurred in the 1960's. By demonizing heroes, and painting them as fools, baby-killers, and ticking time bombs, those who cowardly refused to serve could seem, to themselves at least, to be "better" than those they attacked and ridiculed. It was an absolutely sick and evil way to justify and validate an inexcusable, self-centered cowardice. Unfortunately, it played directly into the hands of those whose motives were the destruction of America and those positive values for which she stands.

This forced "paradigm shift" ran its course by 1980 or so in every segment of society except those with the most invested in its perpetration: the entertainment industry and academia. Sadly, these were the very segments with the ability to keep that Leftist concoction of discredited beliefs on life-support. Those holdover '60s liberals will be around, still pushing their self-justification for craven cowardice, for at least another 20-30 years. They have infected one, maybe two generations with their selfish poison. The best we can do is to reward those, like Gibson and Milius, who do not slur their own country to salve their vestigial consciences. Besides, their movies are more fun.