[In veno, veritas]

I won't be hypocritical in moving to impeach Clinton and not Bush.

[johnfl61]

Barf alert!!

[mrsmith]

Maybe I'll get an answer this time-

Name a President who didn't sign an unconstitutional law.

No answer huh?
Then where's your point?

[Free the USA]

Impeach Bush and any and all federally elected politicians who pretend the Constitution is irrelevant to their job.

[inquest]

Now you can't be impeaching a President for signing an unconstitutional law. But if he were to try to enforce that law, well then...

[Timesink]

With all this in mind, I cannot think of one reason why we should not move for his impeachment. If anyone of you can think of one, please respond.

How about because the bill he signed IS constitutional until and unless the judicial branch says otherwise? And because even if the judicial branch does eventually decide that, that's the way the system works?

[YaYa123]

Yes, I agree with you, #22 & #23 provide persuasive arguments, ample to conclude, the correct response to your question is a resounding "NO".

[Allegra]

Ah...another Democrat infiltrating FR. It's so easy to spot you. Make it a bit of a challenge next time, huh?

[CyberAnt]

Bush is not a Constitutional lawyer - he's a business major. He may suspect the new legislation is not Constitutional, but he doesn't have the tools or knowledge to make such a determination. That's why there are 3 branches of govt.

Just get over it people! You are stuck with Bush - and we have several hot candidates who are lined up and ready to continue his legacy.

[Sci Fi Guy]

I won't be hypocritical in moving to impeach Clinton and not Bush.

Question 1. Is the Charge grounds for impeachment? I am not asking for an emotional response. In the history of the US, has this been considered a grounds for impeachment? Document your answer. Personally I don't think it does. Impeachment is safeguard for ethical - criminal misdoings. The constitutional balance of powers is the safeguard to protect the Constitution and our rights.

Question 2. Does Bush have a resonable response to the charges. Actually he does. All Bush has to do is point out that there are many people who think CFR is constitutional.

Question 3. Since Congress passed this law, Haven't they in effect already ruled that Bush's actions are constitutional?

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Garbage post.

[Windy-Dave]

Now check the response to your question I wrote and you can get a good barometer of the understanding and mind set of most people. The enemy has done its job very well but they don't get by Windy-Dave! Its still those who are UN-ELECTED!