Skip to comments.
MEG Scalar Energy Device Patented - Production Starts NEXT YEAR!
Rense.com ^
| 3/28/02
| Bill Morgan
Posted on 03/29/2002 6:10:25 PM PST by goody2shooz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-186 next last
To: apochromat
Correction about the duty cycle...
"more than 100" should have been "more than 1/100".
To: goody2shooz
Manufactured Exclusively for Wal-mart stores, Made in China
To: Constitutional_Republican
Are the 4D glasses as uncomfortable and cheap as 3D glasses?
To: Diogenesis
All systems, seek a higher state of randomness, unless work is performed to stop them. Work is the use of energy for some period of time. Oh ya, in my mind this includes social, economical and political systems as well. (It's a law).
84
posted on
03/29/2002 8:42:44 PM PST
by
TheHound
To: isthisnickcool;Constitutional_Republican
Someone beat me to it .. . Heinlein also coined the phrase "TANSTAAFL" ... "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch."
Every First Year student (science or engineering), taking first year physics, learns the 3 laws of thermodynamics ... one of which is essentially "TANSTAAFL".
No free energy. Entropy is always increasing. And this device is probably PURE UNMITIGATED BUNK AND BabStreistand.
And if my memory serves right.. the Superman episode had the inventor using $10,000 of something like Platinum to transmute into $5,000 of gold ... therefore a very unproductive exchange!!
Mike
85
posted on
03/29/2002 8:47:21 PM PST
by
Vineyard
To: SamAdams76
But go back to 1900 and tell people that within ten years, people will be flying around in heavier-than-air machines and see if you don't get locked up in an insane asylum. That old canard just doesn't wash. After all, birds had been known to fly since the dawn of man. Galileo had a few ideas on how to achieve such flight, hundreds of years ago. There was nothing about "heavier than air flight" that violated any scientific principles at the time. What they lacked was the required horsepower. Once the engines were available, everyone took to the skies, ( especially the French, who often claim the first flight in history). The Airplane had been worked on for decades, its not like the Wright brothers popped up out of no where.
86
posted on
03/29/2002 8:48:36 PM PST
by
Paradox
To: goody2shooz
Whats the source of energy( zero point) I doubt this is true but its very very cool if it is.
87
posted on
03/29/2002 8:51:56 PM PST
by
weikel
To: goody2shooz
If the thing runs on induction from one's own metered power distribution wiring, then it will show up as a load to the meter.
To: DentsRun
There is nearly unlimited energy in the vacuum( zero point) but Ive always been told that harnessing it would be impossible( if you can harness it you have an infinite power source).
89
posted on
03/29/2002 8:55:43 PM PST
by
weikel
To: Paradox
Fair enough. But airplanes did shock the hell out of a lot of people who just didn't believe it possible.
What about my analogy on the internet? Certainly nobody saw that coming. Not even Bill Gates! The internet has completely changed our lives in an incredibly short period of time. Sometimes the scope of change can be noted in little things. For example, in 1990, if I wanted the sports scores or latest weather report before going to bed, I had to sit up for the 11PM news on TV. Otherwise, I had to wait for the morning paper. Now I can get that information in real time within seconds 24 hours a day. With respect to weather, I can get the same raw information that TV meterologists used to only see. With a click of the mouse, I can get a detailed weather forcast anywhere in the world.
Recently I traveled to Orlando on business. Everything was done online. No need for travel agents. I booked the flight, booked the hotel, booked transportation to and from the hotel. And once I got to the hotel, I could fire up my laptop and access the local newspapers back home as though I never left. I also had access to all my work documents and was able to communicate to all my co-workers through e-mail as though I was still sitting in my office back in Boston. Even CEO's of companies didn't have those kind of capabilities back in 1990.
To: weikel
Perhaps there's someone who would argue that zero point energy is local supply ground potential centered variations, without being too obvious about it. Electrically speaking, it's accurate to call the electrical ground a zero potential energy source.
Glancing through the papers, it appears that this is a kind of magnetic pendulum, where instead of a weight on the end of a string, you have magnetic fields being guided back and forth. Interesting concept, and I'm not inclined to dismiss it out of hand.
92
posted on
03/29/2002 9:03:11 PM PST
by
mvpel
To: apochromat
Well as far as I am in EE ground is where the node voltage=0 I don't think thats the same as zero point energy.
93
posted on
03/29/2002 9:03:33 PM PST
by
weikel
To: weikel
Basically true. But you'll note that ground planes are an important part of many designs. This is to minimize localized ground potential fluctuations.
To: apochromat
Im not into the practical stuff yet.
95
posted on
03/29/2002 9:10:09 PM PST
by
weikel
To: goody2shooz;tech_Index;tech_index;
Mathlete;
Apple Pan Dowdy;
grundle;
Bush2000;
beckett...
I think I will be a skeptic here, just seems a bit far fetched!
Would be nice though!
To find all articles tagged or indexed using tech_index
Click here: tech_index
To: weikel
not zero point energy Besides the fact that everything operates within zero point energy, there's also any power supply writer that defines his terms by unique reference, or by reference to terms of power supplies. If I explain or infer that I'm calling induced ground EMF "zero point energy" for a power supply, then it's obvious to power supply designers.
To: apochromat
98
posted on
03/29/2002 9:23:07 PM PST
by
weikel
To: Paradox
BTTT for one neat link: "I have kept up from time to time on the latest (www.keelynet.com)."
To: goody2shooz
Here's a thought problem for the group: Let's say you have invented a "Free Energy" Device and you knew for certain it would work. But it would take $1 million to build an demonstration model. You have no working model. How would YOU go about raising the money and getting it to market?
Note I'm saying the device WILL work if built. How would you do it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-186 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson