Hmmm… I've said that I don't deny the "link", but the question should be why after I present a reasonable alternative explanation you ignore it, present limited credentials and accuse me of being an aborter. That appears more than a little evasive. Couple that with your "lives are at stake" and "women are dyeing" closings, and it looks more than a little Clintoneque.
I'm not the one denying links backed by studies. I'm simply giving a reasonable alternative for the cause of the link. Some people here are promoting only the abortion one with great certainty while denying the others. I presume there's a positive correlation between the abortion link and their agenda. Judging by your debating tactics here, I now suspect that includes your agenda.
I took a look at www.abortioncancer.com. I don't think I'll get an objective analysis there.