Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obese people more likely to die in car crashes
New Scientist ^ | March 2, 2002 | Kurt Kleiner

Posted on 03/28/2002 7:39:41 AM PST by Paradox

 
 

Obese people more likely to die in car crashes

 
09:30 30 March 02
 
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition
 

Heavier people are more likely to be killed or seriously injured in car accidents than lighter people, according to new research.

 

That could mean car designers will have to build in new safety features to compensate for the extra hazards facing overweight passengers. In the US, car manufacturers have already had to redesign air bags so they inflate to lower pressures, making them less of a danger to smaller women and children. But no one yet knows what it is that puts overweight passengers at extra risk.

A study carried out in Seattle, Washington, looked at more than 26,000 people who had been involved in car crashes, and found that heavier people were at far more risk. People weighing between 100 and 119 kilograms are almost two-and-a-half times as likely to die in a crash as people weighing less than 60 kilograms.

And importantly, the same trend held up when the researchers looked at body mass index (BMI) - a measure that takes height as well as weight into account. Someone 1.8 metres tall weighing 126 kilograms would have a BMI of 39, but so would a person 1.5 metres tall weighing 88 kilograms. People are said to be obese if their BMI is 30 or over.

The study found that people with a BMI of 35 to 39 are over twice as likely to die in a crash compared with people with BMIs of about 20. It is not just total weight, but obesity itself that's dangerous.


Crash-test dummies

While they do not yet know why this is the case, the evidence is worth pursuing, says Charles Mock, a surgeon and epidemiologist at the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center in Seattle, who led the research team. He thinks one answer may be for safety authorities to use heavier crash-test dummies when certifying cars as safe to drive.

Crash tests normally use dummies that represent standard-sized males weighing about 78 kilograms. Recently, smaller crash-test dummies have also been used to represent children inside crashing cars. But larger and heavier dummies are not used, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in Washington DC told New Scientist.

The reasons for the higher injury and death rates are far from clear. Mock speculates that car interiors might not be suitably designed for heavy people. Or obese people, with health problems such as high blood pressure or diabetes, could be finding it tougher to recover from injury.

Richard Kent, an expert in impact biomechanics at the University of Virginia, thinks the new research has established a legitimate connection between obesity and severe injury or death. Because the research used BMI data, it has not confused taller (and therefore heavier than average) people with those who are overweight.

People who are obese might also be at risk because seat belts do not hold them as securely in a crash. "For example, a large amount of [fat] tissue between the restraint system and the bony thorax acts much like a winter coat: it introduces "slack" into the restraint system and decreases its performance," Kent says.

Journal reference: Accident Analysis and Prevention (vol 34, p 221)

 

Kurt Kleiner

 


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: crash; fat; fatties; obese; obesity; overweight; wreck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: RipSawyer
I wouldn't call you slow. Gullible maybe, but not slow. Anyway, in such a unique hypothetical situation, most folks would just use the term "falling". Regardless, in such an instance your hypothetical person would stand a very good chance of breaking an ankle, a leg, a wrist, possibly even a hip or his pelvis, but he would not become "busted open like a ripe watermelon and his guts spilled out".
81 posted on 03/28/2002 6:00:22 PM PST by flyervet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
I'll bet even Gallagher knows the human torso is stronger than an eggshell.
82 posted on 03/28/2002 6:01:57 PM PST by flyervet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: flyervet
He fell on a flat surface

The account says he fell FROM a flat surface. It was not specified as to what the surface was that he fell on. Perhaps he fell on a sharp object that cut him open. The fall, plus the forward velocity from the mule, could have caused him to "split open". Sounds plausible to me, but I always understand these stories as anecdotal anyways, and don't take them too seriously, I just sit back and enjoy them.

83 posted on 03/29/2002 9:23:35 AM PST by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
This thread would be no funnier if Gallager showed up.

I am about ready to post the sign-up sheet for the annual Snipe Hunt. Think there will be any takers?

84 posted on 04/01/2002 8:10:28 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: MotleyGirl70
Very good thread,thanks for the link.
85 posted on 07/20/2003 1:06:55 PM PDT by cmsgop (Has anyone seen my Schwab ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson