Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: toenail
If we're not to grade him by his adherence to his Constitutional duties, then what else should he be graded on?

Try these.

If you were capable of seeing the big picture, you would see that by signing this bill - while expressing the same concerns regarding constitutionality most conservatives have - he will be setting it up to die NOW, and not rear its ugly head down the road.

153 posted on 03/28/2002 11:49:57 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
"If you were capable of seeing the big picture, you would see that by signing this bill - while expressing the same concerns regarding constitutionality most conservatives have - he will be setting it up to die NOW, and not rear its ugly head down the road."

We should heap praises on McCain and Shays and Feingold and Meehan and Boxer and Hillary!, and every other person who violated their oath of office? We should each send 'em a box of chocolates for advancing this, so that once and for all the SCOTUS can settle it. The people who actually chose to defend the Constitution (I was particularly pleased with Jo Ann Emerson) are actually obstructors who wanted to prevent the SCOTUS from hearing it? Was there a wrong vote here? If everything can be passed of with "Let the SCOTUS decide," then there can be no wrong votes about anything. Bawney Fwank can stand up, say that he knows parts of it are unConstitutional, and votes for it anyway. And Bush sided with him.

What lesson did Bush teach Americans? A sacred oath MEANS NOTHING. What a disgusting, shameful day for our country.

157 posted on 03/28/2002 12:29:16 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson