Has anyone figured out why allegations of rape would be relevant to the articles of impeachment? I certainly don't see it.
I'd be pissed at the women who did not press charges against Clinton at the appropriate time.
Has anyone figured out why allegations of rape would be relevant to the articles of impeachment? I certainly don't see it. Identifying the Chief Executive as a raping, snorting, perjuring, sexually predatory, treasonous, trial tampering criminal kinda casts a pall over his promise to "faithfully execute the laws of the United States", wouldn't you say?
This is why Washington stated (paraphrasing) Let none but decent and moral men hold this office.