Skip to comments.
Ray Won't Discuss Secret Clinton Evidence
NEWSMAX ^
| 3/26/02
| Limbacher
Posted on 03/26/2002 4:27:10 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The sexual abuse of the pervert makes me sick.
But TREASON IS STILL THE REASON.
To: copycat
Star did a remarkably bad job. He had tons to work on and concentrated on the sex part. He refused to let the prosecutor prosecute the Foster death. I think Star took a dive from day one. One source said he was the Clinton choice from day one. All the noise masked the fact that he was in their pocket.
I saw lots of people do the right thing after lying for the Clintons. That also did it. One cannot lie first, then tell the truth, then expect to be believed.
42
posted on
03/27/2002 6:02:04 AM PST
by
Chemnitz
To: metesky
Think anybody will listen to us old geezers screaming, "I told you so!" from our walkers?Hey, with walkers, we'll have more room for protest signs! I certainly hope we will have an Old FReepers Home somewhere!
43
posted on
03/27/2002 6:08:00 AM PST
by
mombonn
To: hole_n_one
It All Makes Sense Now. Ray Running for Senate as a Democrat. Hmmmm. No wonder he didn't want to release any damaging information, he want's the Clinton votes... hmmmmm
To: SR71A
see post #24
45
posted on
03/27/2002 9:08:33 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: Tickle Me Pank
Agreed, the evidence must have had some nexus, some relevance to the articles of impeachment. The question remains, what was the evidence? Any speculation? Could be an interesting thread........
46
posted on
03/27/2002 9:14:42 AM PST
by
mwl1
To: Deltaforceeoo7
You are sooooo correct. Brings to mind the phrase "You don't sh*t where you eat!"
You don't expose the x-president (and by the way, Clinton should now always be referred to as X-president, not ex-president), and all the members of both parties that are guilty as well, when you are planning on joining the gang.
47
posted on
03/27/2002 9:14:52 AM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: Deltaforceeoo7
The irony of all this is that Ray has managed to anger everyone... RATS are furious at any investigation, and GOP is furious that investigation was flawed, too timid.
Ray's a sure loser against a bare-knuckle fighter like Torricelli.
48
posted on
03/27/2002 9:16:26 AM PST
by
mwl1
To: Ditter
Thanks! "Smack Her" for me....
Nixon's "crimes" were done for Socio-Political reasons (however misguided!) His "Crimes" were committed to benefit his vision of the Nation's "best interests"--as he saw it. His Crimes were NOT committed for personal gain.
Clintons' crimes were ALL ABOUT their personal finances & personal legal protection---the Crimes were TOTALLY Venal! The "Clinton Crimes" TOTALLY SACRIFICED the "Public Good" to benefit the Clintons!
The contrasts are striking & profound!
"APPLES & ORANGES!!"
Doc
To: breakem
LOL! Thanks for the heads up!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson