Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazarus Long
I am not trying to speak for Rep Paul, but I think he mentions it because that argument can be used to get around Congress voting on the declaration of war.

He is showing the lack of authority Bush is preparing to act on. Even though the UN thing is bs, it is still an option on the table.

29 posted on 03/26/2002 10:36:23 AM PST by smokinandvotin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: smokinandvotin
IMHO your interpretation matches mine. A number of POTUS scoundrels have come up with all sorts of vehicles to circumvent a Constitutional declaration of war.
Tonkin Gulf, Bosnia, etc. etc.
Without even the flimsy excuse of NATO says it's OK, or the UN, or whatever, it's not right.
I believe Paul is pointing out that Bush doesn't even have any of those.
T
37 posted on 03/26/2002 10:42:59 AM PST by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson