[Howlin]

What is that supposed to prove?

If you can produce for me ANY time a law has not been enacted because of a presidential veto ALONE, then perhaps I might consider the fact that you are serious, rather than trying to force Bush into a corner.

If Bush has the DUTY to do it, then there HAVE to be other laws that have NOT been enacted, right? I mean, they ALL can't be constitutional, can they?

[NittanyLion]

If you can produce for me ANY time a law has not been enacted because of a presidential veto ALONE, then perhaps I might consider the fact that you are serious, rather than trying to force Bush into a corner.

Michigander did, in Post #45. Of course, Congress has a chance to override, if that's what you're getting at.