If Bush cannot use his best judgement as to the constitutionality of the bill and act accordingly, then why did we even bother to administer to him his oath of office? (and demand an answer in the affirmative to become President)
If Bush cannot use his best judgement as to the constitutionality of the bill and act accordingly, then why did we even bother to administer to him his oath of office? At the risk of repeating myself time after time, where EXACTLY in the Constitution does it say that the POTUS can decide a bill is unconstitional ON HIS OWN and just not sign it?
And remember, if you give this "right" to THIS POTUS, you're giving it to all the ones that follow him, you know, the ones that will be elected when you stay home.