Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
Uh actually not, if that was true, there would be no need for a Supreme Court.

So you are suggesting then, that the legislative and executive branches are under no obligation to even TRY to adhere to the constitution, cause the good old SCOTUS is there.

No wonder people don't take you seriously.

202 posted on 03/25/2002 12:58:56 PM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
So you are suggesting then, that the legislative and executive branches are under no obligation to even TRY to adhere to the constitution, cause the good old SCOTUS is there.

No wonder people don't take you seriously.

Ah yes, the obligatory OWK insult, no Constituional thread on FR would seem the same without one.

235 posted on 03/25/2002 1:10:33 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson