[Howlin]

There's the "moral relativism" I was talking about.

Please explain to me how, if I disagree with you, I am wrong?

[Triple]

"Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States; if he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his objections to that House in which it shall have originated..." - Article 1 section 7 the US Constitution

Man you are thick headed.

The President has the sole authority to veto - Article 1 section 7.

[Harrison Bergeron]

""Please explain to me how, if I disagree with you, I am wrong?"

You said: "Just because I disagree with you doesn't make me wrong."

The statement in itself, when used to validate a point of argument, is moral relativism. To make such a statement truthful in the logical sense one would have to agree that the reverse is just as valid - that nobody is wrong. It's the modern day newspeak of the left. It's the stomach turning rhetoric for which boards like DU are famous. Very disappointing to read on FR indeed.