Case in point the Boston Globe, weak sister of the NY Times has an editorial board that is 75% homosexual and yet can't seem to use the word "homosexual" when reporting about chickenhawk priests.
I don't suppose they'll do any better when the educational profession is examined.
Yes, they're desperately trying to spin this as "pedophilia" and using the argument that homosexuals are no more likely to be "pedophiles" than heterosexuals. The overwhelming majority of the victims are post-pubescent teenage boys. If this was a "pedophilia" problem involving both homo and hetero priests, we should be seeing young pre-pubescent girls and boys as victims, and we're not. The church is riddled with homosexual chickenhawks who prey on teenaged boys. I'm glad the boyscouts were able to resist these scum, and prevail in court.