Posted on 03/24/2002 1:51:37 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
Sixty-five million dead civilians, and he calls it "security."
Clinton gave Jiang a gift with the Belgrade embassy bombing.
The Hainan EP-3C incident, too, presented the beetles of Beijing with a foreign devil to wave about.
A power elite which exploits the masses--no, wait, that's those warmongering capitalist running dogs.
We have met the hegemonic main enemy and we're on first.
Do you (and some others in this thread) truly wish suffering on these people? Why not go all the way and say you wish all of these people would just drop dead?
If unrest brings about freedoms, then yes suffering will be part of that transition. What!? You prefer they stay in chains because it's easier? Odd.
Awwww, c'mon! How can I say this more clearly? The issue is not about the reality of suffering in China, or about the pain that is accompanying China's transition to a new economic system.
In post #8, Joe clearly wished increased pain and suffering on the Chinese people. Judging from Joe's later comment in #24, he does not appear to care whether or not China makes the transition successfully; he just wants them to suffer. Am I the only one in this thread who finds that attitude to be appalling?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.