Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control Advocate may have violated Gun Laws (Sarah Brady)
Miami.com ^ | March 23,2002 | TIMOTHY J. BURGER

Posted on 03/23/2002 6:43:17 PM PST by Seeking the truth

Gun-control advocate Sarah Brady bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements, the New York Daily News has learned.

Brady reveals in a new memoir that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, complete with scope and safety lock, at a Lewes, Del., gun shop.

"I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that rifle, loaded it into my little car and drove home," she writes. "It seemed so incredibly strange: Sarah Brady, of all people, packing heat."

Brady became a household name as a crusader for stricter gun-control laws after her husband, James, then the White House press secretary, was seriously wounded in a 1981 assassination attempt on then-President Ronald Reagan.

Brady writes in "A Good Fight" that the unnamed gun shop ran federal Brady Law and Delaware state background checks with great fanfare.

The book suggests that she did not have her son checked, as required by Delaware state law.

"(W)hen the owner called in the checks, it seemed to me he spoke unnecessarily loudly, repeating and spelling my name over and over on the phone," Brady writes.

Amy Stillwell, a spokeswoman for The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said the federal Brady Law does not require background checks for intrafamily gun gifts.

Stillwell said she did not know whether her son was checked under the state law. The Delaware Department of Justice says the state does not have an exemption for family gifts.

"Scott is not a convicted felon, and he is not prohibited from owning a gun," Stillwell said. "Scott Brady could walk into a store and buy a - he is not a prohibited purchaser."

Delaware Justice Department spokeswoman Lori Sitler said the purchase could be illegal under state law if Brady did not also say who she was buying the gun for and submit his "name, rank and serial number" for a full check.

"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler said yesterday. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."

Anti-gun control advocates were surprised to hear of Brady's foray into their world.

"We hope that it's innocuous and there's been no laws violated," said James Jay Baker, chief lobbyist for the National Rifle Association. "It's obviously interesting that Sarah would be purchasing firearms of any kind for anybody, given her championing of restrictive guns laws for everyone."



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; sarahbrady; strawpurchase
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 03/23/2002 6:43:17 PM PST by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
I'm shocked....absolutely shocked! Maybe she compared notes with Diane Feinstein on the finer points of being a hypocrite!
2 posted on 03/23/2002 6:45:27 PM PST by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth; bang_list
Brady Bunch bang
3 posted on 03/23/2002 6:52:41 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
If they don't throw the book at her they will have absolutely no credibility every again. Specifically, it will be raised as a matter of record in every single trial under the law from now on.
4 posted on 03/23/2002 6:55:16 PM PST by Abn1508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Abn1508
As it should.......
5 posted on 03/23/2002 6:59:36 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Brady became a household name as a crusader for stricter gun-control laws after her husband, James, then the White House press secretary, was seriously wounded in a 1981 assassination attempt on then-President Ronald Reagan.

Brady became a household name as a crusader for stricter gun-control laws only after her husband got shot...I mean really....who cares if the little people in the ghettos all around her in the DC were killing each other!?!

6 posted on 03/23/2002 7:04:13 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Sarah Brady violated the laws of decency....long time ago!
7 posted on 03/23/2002 7:06:02 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Haven't had time to read through the federal gun laws lately, but I don't think there is an exception for an "intrafamily gift".

A straw purchase is a straw purchase, and that is in violation of federal gun laws, as well as those in certain states. Of course, the libs will let her spin her way out of a law that would and has put many in jail, and demolished their rights under the Constitution forever.

I would like to see the pu$$ys at the NRA get going and hammer the Brady Bitch with her own gun control laws. But James Baker "hopes" this is just some kind of oversight. What a wienie.

8 posted on 03/23/2002 7:10:19 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcbtinman
Gifts are actually legal under federal law, so long as the gifter is not knowingly making the purchase because the recipient is known to be a prohibited person. Only if the giftee is a prohibited person is it a "straw sale."

However, Delaware state law apparently requires a check for the giftee as well, so the major violation is DE law, not federal law. But, as an added bonus, the federal transfer is legal "if the sale is otherwise legal under state law." Hence, if there is a state law violation, there may be an added federal charge because it wouldn't have been "otherwise legal" if DE law is found to be violated.

9 posted on 03/23/2002 7:16:16 PM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Sarah Brady's second-hand smoke killed more people than my guns. And it's a wonder she's still alive... cough... cough
10 posted on 03/23/2002 7:31:42 PM PST by my trusty sig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws
Crime/Corruption
Source: miami.com
13 comments.

Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws By TIMOTHY J. BURGER New York Daily News Posted on Thu, Mar. 21, 2002 WASHINGTON - Gun-control advocate Sarah Brady bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements, the New York Daily News has learned. Brady reveals in a new memoir that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, complete with scope and safety lock, at a Lewes, Del., gun shop. "I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that rifle, loaded it into my little car and...

12527189 posted on 3/22/02 6:25 PM Eastern by Johnny_Apollo

Gun control advocate may have violated gun laws
Culture/Society Keywords: BRADY
Source: Kentucky.com
Published: Thu, Mar. 21, 2002 Author: Timothy J. Burger
173 comments.

WASHINGTON - Gun-control advocate Sarah Brady bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements, the New York Daily News has learned....(Read the rest here)

12519295 posted on 3/22/02 12:07 PM Eastern by Inspector Harry Callahan


11 posted on 03/23/2002 7:36:47 PM PST by the
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Yep, nothing like buying an '06..favored by snipers, used at 1,000 yard matches. Why work up close, when you can really "reach out and touch someone?" And, in the world according to Sarah Brady, we create killers with our gun culture, so she is probably helping a future clock tower killer.
12 posted on 03/23/2002 7:37:48 PM PST by stylin_geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
"I'm shocked....absolutely shocked! Maybe she compared notes with Diane Feinstein on the finer points of being a hypocrite!"

Do you suppose she checked in with Rosie also. These people never cease to amaze me. It's do as I say, not do as I do.

A pox on Sarah Brady.

13 posted on 03/23/2002 7:38:03 PM PST by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Is there anything more worthy of contempt than hypocracy? (Well, perhaps a few things. :0) )
14 posted on 03/23/2002 7:39:37 PM PST by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat
A hypocritical bump!
15 posted on 03/23/2002 7:42:04 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Well, on the bright side, it looks like James Brady Jr. might grow up to NOT follow in Mom's footsteps.
16 posted on 03/23/2002 7:46:12 PM PST by pragmatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
LOL...Feinstein and her AK47 and handgun...I think her and one other "PC" politcal buddy of hers can leagally have a gun in SF.

Brady, Feinstein, Boxer, O'Donald etc hypocrites with guns...

17 posted on 03/23/2002 7:51:51 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
I wonder how old Sarah Brady's son is, and I also wonder why she bought the gun for him?
18 posted on 03/23/2002 8:06:01 PM PST by mootownkck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Would someone please explain to me why a woman that so publicly reviles guns of all kinds is buyin one for her son?

I would question her sanity at this point, which alone is cause for investigation by the FBI and BATF!! Pat her down good boys, she might be "packing heat!"

Quick! Seize her arsenal of "powerful assault weapons!!" ;-)

19 posted on 03/23/2002 8:18:18 PM PST by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wcbtinman
A straw purchase is a straw purchase, and that is in violation of federal gun laws, as well as those in certain states. Of course, the libs will let her spin her way out of a law that would and has put many in jail, and demolished their rights under the Constitution forever.

Laws, I might add, that have been interpreted oh-so-liberally, in order to hound diligent, lawful gun shop owners out of business.

20 posted on 03/23/2002 8:21:32 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson