You are excellent at dodging issues on technicalities.
States' rights then:
How does a state go about enforcing something that would require them to monitor everybody in that state and every location in that state, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?
(you knew exactly what I meant, about how would any law like that be enforced, you chose to dodge it by saying it's not the federal government, well, try to dodge this one).
Let's see how strong your conservative roots are, would you support something that would require the state/local governments to monitor you and your family and your house 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?
Asked and answered. Further, the state only has to enforce it when it has probable cause and not in violation of that fourth amendment thingy.
(you knew exactly what I meant, about how would any law like that be enforced, you chose to dodge it by saying it's not the federal government, well, try to dodge this one).
I did address it, did you bother reading my post? There are many laws that can’t be enforced without probable cause, do you have a point you want to make or are you going to just keep asking the same question over and over. Now how about being a good sport and answer some of my questions?
Let's see how strong your conservative roots are, would you support something that would require the state/local governments to monitor you and your family and your house 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?
This just in from The Redundancy Office for the Department of Redundancy: NO, irrelevant to whether sodomy laws, drug laws, pandering laws…are good and necessary for society.