Skip to comments.
Bush A Religious Bigot? Yes, says The New Republic
http://www.claywaters.com/blogger.html ^
| Clay Waters
Posted on 03/21/2002 10:00:24 AM PST by edmundburk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: edmundburk
atheism is a religion too. It is faith in man or in one's self.
JM
2
posted on
03/21/2002 10:04:05 AM PST
by
JohnnyM
To: edmundburk
OH SHUT THE HELL UP!!!!! What a friggin cry baby. BOO @#$@#ing HOO
To: JohnnyM
It is faith in man or in one's self. Oh that's deep. Only way you could be any more deep is to fart after you say that.
To: JohnnyM
No atheism is not a religion. Religions all aim to connect man to the Gods or God. Look at the meaning of the word and the etymology.
To: edmundburk
6
posted on
03/21/2002 10:11:53 AM PST
by
Ohioan
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: justshutupandtakeit
"Religions all aim to connect man to the Gods or God".
Thats right and atheist see themselves as god.
JM
8
posted on
03/21/2002 10:12:45 AM PST
by
JohnnyM
To: edmundburk
Neither Bush nor Atty. General Ashcroft have mentioned nonbelievers since 9-11, meaning they are trying to write atheists out of Americas moral community In order to be a part of a moral community, you have to have morals to start out. Atheists are people that lack faith and without faith, you cannot have morality.
9
posted on
03/21/2002 10:13:12 AM PST
by
toupsie
To: edmundburk
First they wanted tolerance, then they wanted freedom from religion, now they want to be recognized as if they were a religion. I'm waiting for Atheists to apply for tax-exempt status for their non-religion.
What should Bush say, "people of faith and of non-faith"? Imagine how the Arabs would misinterpret that line...
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: edmundburk
Bush A Religious Bigot? Yes, says The New Republic Couldn't care less. What I'll remember him by is that he's a Constitution-destroying traitor.
Neither Bush nor Atty. General Ashcroft have mentioned nonbelievers since 9-11, meaning they are trying to write atheists out of Americas moral community.
Typical Liberal non-sequitur.
To: toupsie
So an atheist can not lead a moral life?
To: JohnnyM
Not really. Then they wouldn't be atheist.
To: edmundburk
But 9-11 has nothing to do with atheists or agnostics, God bless?m. Why bring in atheism when discussing a holy war pitting a Muslim jihad against a Jewish state and a majority Christian country?
I dunno I thinks them Jihad guys don't like dem atheisters anymore then dem utter religions
16
posted on
03/21/2002 10:28:15 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: edmundburk
I don't remember Clinton or Carter acknowledging atheists. Why is Bush getting the criticism?
I guess this is the pony-tailed liberal allegorical extension of the President being a national father (see 1992 Presidential debate): he feels like the problem child, jealous of his siblings who believe and receive all the attention.
Hey, Pete! Grow up!
To: Phantom Lord
Of course. Through belief in atheism.
18
posted on
03/21/2002 10:30:29 AM PST
by
onedoug
To: Ohioan; Seamole
Thanks for this awesome link.
Seamole did you link/index this incredible essay?
I wish that we could bookmark replies!
To: edmundburk
Athiests aren't worth mentioning. Actually they aren't worth anything. One might say they are worthless.
20
posted on
03/21/2002 10:44:00 AM PST
by
Khepera
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson