Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Gawain
Constitutionality has yet to be determined by the Supreme Court.
5 posted on 03/21/2002 8:24:01 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wolfie
Anyone with a third grade education can see when something is blatantly a violation. I was also ranting about the socialist traitors that sign anti-2A bills.
7 posted on 03/21/2002 8:26:31 AM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
Constitutionality has yet to be determined by the Supreme Court.

Are you suggesting that We The People are unable to read and understand a blatant Constitutional violation? Whether SCOTUS rules for or against this bilge, its still un-Constitutional. And We The People have the ultimate say in that. Period.

13 posted on 03/21/2002 8:31:33 AM PST by Lumberjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
Buckley v. Valeo - 1976

How many times must men of government rule on the Constitution? The 'Constitution' is to lay out our rule over government.

Government out of control is no government at all. Ask Arafat.

26 posted on 03/21/2002 9:03:41 AM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfie
The bill makes it illegal for a third party to run a "vote for/against Candidate X" ad within 60 days of an election.
What part of that do you find Constitutionally debatable???
67 posted on 03/22/2002 6:12:47 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson