Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeronL
Like Roe Vs Wade. It was an issue the courts had no business deciding.

Then you can thank the 14th amendment for that one. Now the 14th amendment, which I hate with a passion, is a part of the constitution. It allowed the R v. W case to be heard in front of them since the amendment has been used to whittle away states rights since its inception sometimes for the good but mostly for ill. Once one state law is found unconstitutional every other state law that is similar in major parts are also unconstitutional. Now as to Bork's words on the election. The only thing the Republicans did was to turn the dagger of "equal protection under the law" back at the Liberals for once. It gave them the opening to argue the issues that the case was decided on.

26 posted on 03/20/2002 10:55:34 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Texasforever
But the courts, the first court it came to should have thrown it out. It should have refused to change the laws after the election.
28 posted on 03/20/2002 10:57:48 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson