Steve Mann
SEEKING COMPENSATION - Prof. Steve Mann, a walking experiment in wearable computers, went through a three-day ordeal trying to board an Air Canada plane bound for Toronto.
Posted on 03/14/2002 6:49:49 PM PST by Darkshadow
STEVE MANN, an engineering professor at the University of Toronto, has lived as a cyborg for more than 20 years, wearing a web of wires, computers and electronic sensors that are designed to augment his memory, enhance his vision and keep tabs on his vital signs. Although his wearable computer system sometimes elicited stares, he never encountered any problems going through the security gates at airports.
Last month that changed. Before boarding a Toronto-bound plane at St. John's International Airport in Newfoundland, Dr. Mann says, he went through a three-day ordeal in which he was ultimately strip- searched and injured by security personnel. During the incident, he said, $56,800 worth of his $500,000 equipment was lost or damaged beyond repair, including the eyeglasses that serve as his display screen.
His lawyer in Toronto, Gary Neinstein, sent letters two weeks ago to Air Canada (news/quote), the airport and the Canadian transportation authority arguing that they acted negligently and seeking reimbursement for the damaged equipment so that Dr. Mann could put his wearable computer back together again.
The difficulties that Dr. Mann faced seem related to the tightening of security in airports since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. But he had flown from Toronto to St. John's two days earlier without a hitch.
On that day, Feb. 16, he said, he followed the routine he has used on previous flights. He told the security guards in Toronto that he had already notified the airline about his equipment. He showed them documentation, some of it signed by his doctor, that described the wires and glasses, which he wears every waking minute as part of his internationally renowned research on wearable computers.
He also asked for permission not to put his computer through the X-ray machine because the device is more sensitive than a laptop. He said that the guards examined his equipment and allowed him to board the flight.
But when he tried to board his return flight on Feb. 18, his experience was entirely different. This time, he said, he was told to turn his computer on and off and put it on the X-ray machine. He took his case to Neil Campbell, Air Canada's customer service manager at the St. John's airport, and spent the next two days arranging conversations between his university colleagues and the airline.
The security guards continued to require that he turn his machine on and off and put it through the X-ray machine while also tugging on his wires and electrodes, he said. Still not satisfied, the guards took him to a private room for a strip-search in which, he said, the electrodes were torn from his skin, causing bleeding, and several pieces of equipment were strewn about the room.
Once his system was turned off, turned on again, X-rayed and dismantled, Dr. Mann passed the security check. When he was finally allowed to go home, some pieces of equipment were not returned to him, he said, and his glasses were put in the plane's baggage compartment although he warned that cold temperatures there could ruin them.
Without a fully functional system, he said, he found it difficult to navigate normally. He said he fell at least twice in the airport, once passing out after hitting his head on what he described as a pile of fire extinguishers in his way. He boarded the plane in a wheelchair.
"I felt dizzy and disoriented and went downhill from there," he said.
Air Canada said that there was no record that any of Dr. Mann's baggage had been lost and that the Canadian transportation agency, Transport Canada, had required that his belongings be X-rayed. "We don't tell the security firms that there is going to be an exception made," said Nicole Couture-Simard, a spokeswoman for Air Canada. "We don't have that authority."
Transport Canada declined to comment on the case except to say that it was reviewing it.
Considering that even tweezers may be confiscated when a passenger boards a flight these days, the stricter scrutiny that Dr. Mann faced may not seem surprising. But for him, the experience raises the question of how a traveler will fare once wearable computing devices are such fixtures on the body that a person will not be able to part with them.
"We have to make sure we don't go into a police state where travel becomes impossible for certain individuals," Dr. Mann said.
Since losing the use of his vision system and computer memory several weeks ago, he said, he cannot concentrate and is behaving differently. He is now undergoing tests to determine whether his brain has been affected by the sudden detachment from the technology.
Alejandro R. Jahad, director of the University of Toronto's Program in E-Health Innovation, who has worked closely with Dr. Mann, said that scientists now had an opportunity to see what happens when a cyborg is unplugged. "I find this a very fascinating case," he said.
Nice logic. Well, I have no record that there is no record of any of his baggage being lost.
See, Steve Mann and Surveil. Cam Players on how to watch the watchers
and EXISTech's fasionable products for eSecurity, eSafety, and eComfort
He may choose to live a life far more integrated with technology than most, but who are Freepers (spending doublepluslong time a day online) to cast stones.
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 23:09:23 -0500 (EST) From: mann@eecg.toronto.edu To: declan@well.com Subject: Re: airport security; What's the problem with totalitarianism... Cc: mann@eecg.toronto.edu Declan, here's a response for your list, which I think your politech readers may find to be of interest: In my new book (published through Randomhouse, Doubleday, with link from http://wearcam.org/cyborg.htm) I introduce the notion of sousveillance (inverse surveillance). Following Simon Davies' definition of "totalitarian regime" we can use a camera as a simple totalitarian tester, e.g. what happens when ordinary citizens photograph officials, (and perhaps enter their faces into a database)? If the officials are upset, we have what we might call a "totalitarian regime". Davies notes that a totalitarian regime is one in which the regime would like to know everything about everyone but reveal nothing about itself. Thus the real question is not so much whether or not we have face cams, but, the real question is whether or not officials also submit to being held accountable (e.g. by way of sousveillance), in the same way we submit to surveillance. In my book I describe 20 years of wearing camera systems, in most day-to-day life, and how people have responded. Most notable is the response of officials. It seems that officials are the ones most afraid of accountability. Thus the creation of World Sousveillance Day (http://wearcam.org/wsd.htm) every year, December 24th in which passengers photograph cab drivers, customers photograph shopkeepers, citizens photograph police, etc.. There is also a photo competition to encourage participants to send in pictures to be included in a national face recognition database. ********
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.