Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

167 airport workers fail security check
Washington Times ^ | 3/14/02 | (UPI)

Posted on 03/14/2002 11:50:34 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:52:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Fingerprinting and background checks have thus far uncovered criminal histories on more than 4 percent of the employees at Chicago's two major airports.

The Chicago Department of Aviation said Thursday that 167 workers had been denied identification badges that would have given them access to secure areas at O'Hare International and Midway Airports.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airportworkers; airseclist; fail
Before you blame Bush, did he provide a means to an end with some of these bills? Remember that by creating a majority after the next election allows us to get everything done that the Rats have so far firewalled.
1 posted on 03/14/2002 11:50:34 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
About 30,000 of the 53,000 people that work at O'Hare and Midway had ID badges giving them access to secure areas.

Can't say I'm surprised about Midway. I'm always reminded of Dr. Moreau's island whenever I go through there...

2 posted on 03/14/2002 11:55:40 AM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hey, what are you so concerned about. This sounds like the records of the rats in Congress. No big deal!

Besides, 167 of that number had subsequently been denied security access based on 37 disqualifying crimes that include murder, extortion and kidnapping.</B?

So are you worried about a little murder, extortion and kidnapping? Sounds like Je$$'s gangs threaten, er, promise business owner across America every day.

(Sarcasm off) I surprised the number was 5 to 10 times higher. Being an illegal alien must not have been a trigger crime (one of the 37 disqualifying crimes).

I would like a list of the crimes that they could commit and not have worry about keeping their jobs.

3 posted on 03/14/2002 12:11:21 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is happening everywhere, not just O'Hare."

Why am I not surprised?

4 posted on 03/14/2002 12:18:17 PM PST by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is what happens when security goes to the lowest bidder. good thing the government has stepped in to take charge, huh? We would have never found out if they hadn't.
5 posted on 03/14/2002 12:38:29 PM PST by mykej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *AirSec_list
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
6 posted on 03/14/2002 12:50:09 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mykej
"lowest bidder"

Private industry would have been less.

7 posted on 03/14/2002 4:02:20 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I worked as a ticket agent for a major airline. I was fingerprinted when I was hired in 1963, and again by the government in 1986, I think. Before 1986 I could go anywhere in the building but after 1986 only certain employees were allowed to go into "secure" areas; they had special ID cards.

The condition of hire is supposed to be that everyone is fingerprinted and has a background check before they start work. They are not supposed to be working prior to the background check being completed.

8 posted on 03/14/2002 4:09:03 PM PST by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diefree
When we considering all of these problems, who's hiring, training, promoting...?
9 posted on 03/14/2002 4:11:27 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm not sure I understand your question. I worked at JFK which, being a port of arrival into the country, comes under Federal rules. All companies involved at the airport have to verify the employees who work in sensitive areas. I don't think, for example, that people who work in the restaurants or newsstands would have to be fingerprinted or have a background check done.
10 posted on 03/14/2002 4:17:52 PM PST by diefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I don't give a rat's ass how many employees failed the security check at Chicago's airports. I want to know how many A-rabs are working at the airport. A-rabs are the enemy and if you lose sight of that, the war on terrorism is lost.

Of course in this PC United Staters of America the war is already lost.

11 posted on 03/14/2002 4:34:23 PM PST by Bloody Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson