Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: MeeknMing
"We have not come up with any definitive time frame, but it is certainly consistent with hours, not days," he said. "The body was not that decomposed at all. He wasn't hit that many days prior to being discovered." Does anyone else see a flaw in this reasoning?
40 posted on
03/13/2002 6:26:30 AM PST by
Illbay
To: MeeknMing
"We have not come up with any definitive time frame, but it is certainly consistent with hours, not days," he said. "The body was not that decomposed at all. He wasn't hit that many days prior to being discovered." Um, helloooooo? Does this strike anyone as a bit stupid? The body wasn't decomposed so he must have died sooner? The longer he was alive the less decomposition there would be!
-bc
62 posted on
03/13/2002 8:17:32 AM PST by
BearCub
To: MeeknMing
Okay, now that makes me feel better.....
To: MeeknMing
And would she not have let him die over days if that's what it took?
No, therefore its irrelevant to heinousness of her actions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson