Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VA Advogado
Life in prison.

I disagree. Otherwise, what's to keep her from squeezing out a few more kiddos then retroactively aborting them? Since the hubby seems to consider her his brood mare, I can easily see a death sentence from this jury in the punishment phase.

30 posted on 03/12/2002 2:16:51 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: strela
How is she going to squeeze out kids in prison?
33 posted on 03/12/2002 2:19:18 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: strela
I disagree. Otherwise, what's to keep her from squeezing out a few more kiddos then retroactively aborting them?

Well, thats the only possible scenario I think that could reasonably lead to a conclusion that she's a threat. However, I dont know if the law allows the jury to take into account facts not in existance at the time of their deliberation when considering 'future danger'. I know, its splitting hairs but these are the type of issues that get appealed.

37 posted on 03/12/2002 2:21:11 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: strela
Maybe the jury believed she really did love her children and will shortly arrange a reunion.

Oops, her children will be spending eternity in Heaven. I suspect God has another place for folks who commit mass murder in His name: she'll spend eternity with the Taliban. Won't that be Hell.

47 posted on 03/12/2002 2:27:40 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson