I don't necessarily disagree with that, but whatever they finally charge her with there still has to be intent.
Without intent, mens rea, there cannot be a crime.
She certainly intended his death in that garage, and had a couple of days to think about it. It doesn't get much more premeditated than that.
Of course there was "intent." She "intended" to let the guy die while he was lodged in her windshield. She apparently had numerous opportunities to get help for him, but chose the "easy" route: Let the guy die, and then she'll get friends to dispose of his body.
Not only was there "intent," my friend, but there was PREMEDITATION. You can't tell me she thought he'd just heal up and walk off under his own power. No, she knew the guy would die, and her problem would be solved.
She deserves a capital murder conviction and a trip to the gurney.
Oh, and BTW: Courts have already ruled that a drunk driver who kills someone, was "premeditative," in that he chose to drink and drive. That he didn't INTEND to hurt anyone is irrelevant. He didn't care and someone died.
Same as this b**ch.
All these legalities are making my head spin. How about: vehicular assault with or without intent to maim, kidnapping, abuse, neglect, and finally, wrongful death/murder...in that order? I'm sure the folks here can come up with more...