Posted on 03/08/2002 5:53:58 PM PST by monkeyshine
I don't think Arafat's ploy will work. I don't think Sharon can lose his seat just by having Labor walk out. Sharon is trying to appease the left though, as evidenced by his eliminating his demand for 7 days of quiet before negotiations. It's a concession to his left, and to Europe and the State Dept of the USA. They'll have to get a concession out of Arafat next. And besides, it doesn't mean that the violence will stop, it just means they'll negotiate under fire.
Arafat is slowly but surely putting himself in a position where he will become, de facto as well as de jure, an enemy of the United States. Should he become openly hostile to us, we may just smite him down to set an example for the other Arabs.
We are not the Israelis. The Israelis are fine in the air, but they are simply not in our league in ground combat. Arafat can only compare us to the Israelis that he knows.
He thinks he will win. He underestimates the force of will possessed by George W. Bush.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Israel delays their final incursion on the sixty percenters, to their own peril, as does the USA in its final incursion into Iraq.
The time to strike with finality, IS NOW. Unilaterally. In tandem. With or without allies.
We need to be careful we don't let them kill or kidnap our "peace" envoy. To the radical muslims, such an act, would be one of supreme valor and courage. Never forget, Islam, is PeaceTM
Our muslim terrorist buddies are counting on us believing it.
And while the IDF may be no match for the USA, the PA is no match for the IDF. If Israel wanted to, they could crush the PA like a bug in short order. If Debka is right, 600 fighters surrendered today in one camp, after dozens were killed all around. Even they know they can't win -- and if the IDF can keep getting these kill/surrender numbers, it won't be long until the PA is defeated. Arafat cannot allow his forces to become so depleted that he risks his own seat in power.
Actually, it's better to have allies than not. The USA made it perfectly clear to NATO that we would take on Afghanistan alone. The Brits stepped up immediately and offered assistance. We are probably doing the same thing with Iraq -- saying we will go it alone, and giving them some time to commit to fighting with us.
When we go into Iraq, and it can't be too long now (a few weeks or months, probably after the Arab summit), Israel will make the big push.
Zinni, the Saudi plan, and Sharon's retraction of the "7 days of quiet" demand are all dilatory tactics, IMHO. But you never know what will happen in the meantime.
This cannot be minimized (which is why I repeat it often). For some reason Bush Sr. thought Arafat could be rehabilitated after we crushed Saddam in 1991. Maybe he thought Arafat would have learned his lesson vicariously through the humiliation of Saddam. Apparantly not. Arafat and Saddam are Nazi birds of a feather. If Saddam goes down, Arafat must go with him.
Amazing how he's played the Iranian Mullahs for fools and gotten away with it.
The thing with the status quo is, Israel is free to go into the camps, to bomb the intallations, to target terrorists, etc. Once Israel builds a wall, or pulls out, they can't.
Yes, obviously they are keeping him around. For now. It suits their short term purposes. Does it suit the long term peace? Maybe after Saddam goes down, there will be the will to oust Arafat and a lack of resistence among the Arab states. If all sides truly want peace, then peacemakers need to lead, not warmakers.
I disagree. In the past, maybe this was so -- in a tit for tat way it only made each side angry... like poking a tiger.
But now it's getting serious. Israel is starting to make serious moves. If the reports of 60 dead in one day, and 100's surrendering, are true that means the IDF is accomplishing a weakening of the Palestinian will to fight.
As I said, Arafat cannot weaken himself through death and surrenders to the point that he loses his ability to maintain power. Surrenders and massive death has a morale weakening effect, and PA leaders will begin to question the wisdom of proceeding in this vein. That is the purpose, and it has tremendous military value.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.