Posted on 03/08/2002 6:22:04 AM PST by fm1
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate passed and sent to
President Bush Friday a recession relief package extending jobless benefits and providing billions of dollars in business tax cuts. Bush called it "a very good bill" even though it is far less than he wanted.
The final vote for approval was 85-9 and came a day after the bill cleared the House by 417-3. The swift action followed months of partisan gridlock that saw three previous House-passed versions blocked in the Senate.
"The unemployed and struggling businesses have had to wait too long for the good news," said Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.
Bush did not get several major elements he wanted, including accelerated income tax cuts, a new round of rebate checks, repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax or a tax credit to help the jobless buy health insurance. But the president said he was eager to sign it into law.
"We've had too much nonmovement on this important issue, and it's time to go," Bush said Thursday.
The bill, said Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, is "very similar to what we have introduced and supported and voted for and advocated."
The Senate vote came a day after Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan presented a more upbeat economic forecast than he had a week earlier. Given the size of the U.S. economy, Greenspan told the Senate Banking Committee, the relatively modest stimulus package would have little impact on recession recovery.
"I doubt very much that the economy, if it didn't get a stimulus, would sag," Greenspan said.
The Senate Budget Committee chairman, Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said those comments illustrate how difficult it is for Congress to act on recession relief.
"Every single time we've tried to do it, we've moved too late," he said.
Others complained that some of the business tax cuts would cost states $14.6 billion over the next three years, because many states base their corporate tax structures on the federal system.
"It will no doubt be hurtful to the states," said Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.
Senate Passes $51 Billion 'Job Creation Bill'
The Senate March 8 followed the House in approving a $51 billion "job creation" package administration officials have endorsed as a reasonable compromise. Following a brief floor debate about the pros and cons of the bill, Senate lawmakers approved the House's revamped "Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002" (H.R. 3090) on a vote of 85 to 9 early March 8. The House overwhelmingly passed the bill 417 to 3 a day earlier. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said March 7 President Bush would sign the legislation. House and Senate Republicans admitted the bill -- which delivers $43 billion in corporate tax breaks this year vs. $8 billion in unemployment insurance (UI) assistance to displaced workers -- was a far cry from Bush's initial stimulus or the House's $100 billion stimulus bill which passed back in October, but said this new package was still a worthwhile endeavor. "Frankly, I think we wound up about where we should have been," Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., said after the vote. "I think we wound up with the best of all worlds." Similarly, House and Senate Democrats said they dropped their push for rebate checks and worker subsidies for health care insurance in favor of locking in the UI extension for workers left jobless after September 11 as well as a two-year fix for a bundle of popular business tax breaks that expired last December. The compromise legislation features: a three-year, 30 percent depreciation boost for business, along with the requisite alternative minimum tax modification for the depreciation allowance ($35 billion in 2002, $16 billion through 2012); an increase in the two-year carryback for net operating losses to five years; a waiver of the 90 percent limitation against the AMT ($8 billion in 2002, $2 billion through 2012); a bundle of targeted tax breaks to spur investment in the New York areas damaged as a result of the September 11 terrorist attacks ($484 million in 2002, $5 billion through 2012); a two-year fix for most of the so-called tax extenders ($394 million in 2002, $4 billion through 2012); a five-year extension of the subpart F exception for active financing income for insurance companies operating abroad ($315 million in 2002, $9 billion through 2012); a handful of technical tax corrections ($2 billion in 2002, $3 billion through 2012); and a base 13-week extension of UI benefits that can be automatically renewed for an extra 13 weeks should states require additional resources ($9 billion in 2002, $13 billion through 2012). The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the bill will cost $51 billion in 2002, approximately $94 billion from 2002 to 2007, and about $42 billion through 2012.
|
They should call this bill the Interest Rate Hike Acceleration Act of 2002.
Babble-on - let me tell you, that my business is one business that will surely take advantage of the additional depreciation allowance.
RWfromkansas - I agree Bush will and should get the credit. Frankly, however, for those who really followed the debate it looks like he had to give up more than the Dems, but no matter. I like the business tax cuts just would have liked the personal rate cuts too.
That is not my experience with small business. Purchases are made sooner because of accelareted depreciation.
In fact the reverse effect was felt heavily when the real estate w/o's were drastically reduced from 18 years to 27.
Current depreciation schedule allows 20% write-off in year one, this bill moves it to 30%, and the tax savings on that would be in the 25 to 35% range. It's like getting a 2% discount on your asset purchase. Is that really going to be a driver of the internal rate of return on a financed piece of capital equipment? Give me a break. But it means the government is back in deficit and my personal tax rates won't drop for a decade so GE can pay less taxes. Let's eschew corporate welfare in favor of a truly smaller government spending profile and lower taxes for all.
Frankly, I would have perferred personal tax cuts but the Dems said "no" to that, even if in place of the business tax cuts.
First, accelerating depreciation doesn't lower anyone's taxes. Second, if it only lowered corporate taxes you and I would be better off. Corporate taxes are passed on to me and you.
|
The proposal, offered by U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.), would have offered a 30% depreciation bonus. The measure was defeated by a vote of 45 to 39.
Following the defeat, Smith immediately introduced a new amendment seeking a two-year depreciation bonus. No action was taken on that measure immediately.
The bonus would work this way: If a computer costs $1,000, the purchaser would be able to write off a bonus 30% of the cost in the first year, or $300, plus 20% (the normal depreciation spread over five years) of the remaining $700.
Although the failure of Smith's proposal is a setback, it's not the end of efforts to get a depreciation bonus approved.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) this month said he would back an accelerated depreciation plan, but it would be limited to one year and would be retroactive to last September.
Supporters of the original depreciation bill are hopeful the two-year version will win passage: "I think it was an attempt to meet [the Democrats] halfway," said a spokesman for Smith.
Technology industry trade groups said they're worried that a short-term depreciation bonus will have the same impact that zero percent financing had on automobile makers.
"You get that huge jump in sales and then you fall off the cliff," said Harris Miller, president of the Information Technology Association of America in Arlington, Va. "That's why we are pushing for that longer period of time."
The Daschle depreciation proposal doesn't give companies enough time to take advantage of it, said Robert Cresanti, vice president of public policy at the Business Software Alliance. "A period of less than a year is just not a reasonable length of time for companies to plan," said Cresanti.
The U.S. House last year approved a three-year, 30% depreciation bonus.
Yes, I do feel a chill. RATS do that to me don't ya know.
Daschle got a bill that will do NOTHING to stimulate the economy. Daschle cares not one wit for the economic state of this country. His whole reason for drawing breath is to embarrass the President.
"Millionaire" is the alphabet news outlets name for Republicans. Its "public servant" for 'rats.
Freepers will make sure of this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.